Bayesian polynomial neural networks and polynomial neural ordinary differential equations

Symbolic regression with polynomial neural networks and polynomial neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are two recent and powerful approaches for equation recovery of many science and engineering problems. However, these methods provide point estimates for the model parameters and are currently unable to accommodate noisy data. We address this challenge by developing and validating the following Bayesian inference methods: the Laplace approximation, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling methods, and variational inference. We have found the Laplace approximation to be the best method for this class of problems. Our work can be easily extended to the broader class of symbolic neural networks to which the polynomial neural network belongs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012414
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bayesian polynomial neural networks and polynomial neural ordinary differential equations

Linda Petzold, Prashant Singh, Colby Fronk, Jae-Woong Yun
8 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
2.25
article

Bayesian polynomial neural networks and polynomial neural ordinary differential equations

Linda Petzold, Prashant Singh, Colby Fronk, Jae-Woong Yun
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Symbolic regression with polynomial neural networks and polynomial neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are two recent and powerful approaches for equation recovery of many science and engineering problems. However, these methods provide point estimates for the model parameters and are currently unable to accommodate noisy data. We address this challenge by developing and validating the following Bayesian inference methods: the Laplace approximation, Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling methods, and variational inference. We have found the Laplace approximation to be the best method for this class of problems. Our work can be easily extended to the broader class of symbolic neural networks to which the polynomial neural network belongs.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 20(10)
Uppsala University (SE), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
National Science Foundation, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Aalto-Yliopisto, University of Toronto, China Scholarship Council, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, University of California, Santa Barbara, University of California, San Diego, Materials Research Science and Engineering Center, Harvard University, Office of the President, University of California, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Division of Materials Research, California NanoSystems Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
2.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.