Handling Failures in Secondary Radio Access Failure Handling in Operational 5G Networks

In this work, we conduct a measurement study with three US operators to reveal three types of problematic failure handling on secondary radio access which have not been reported before. Compared to primary radio access failures, secondary radio access failures do not hurt radio access availability but significantly impact data performance, particularly when 5G is used as secondary radio access to boost throughput. Improper failure handling results in significant throughput loss, which is unnecessary in most instances. We then pinpoint the root causes behind these three types of problematic failure handling. When 5G provides higher throughput, failures are more likely to be falsely triggered by a specific event, causing the User Equipment (UE) to unnecessarily lose well-performing 5G connections. Moreover, after failures, the recovery of secondary radio access may fail due to inconsistent parameter settings or be delayed due to missing specific signaling fields. To address these issues, we propose SCGFailure Manager (<sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SFM</small>), a solution to optimize the detection and recovery of secondary radio access failures. Our evaluation results demonstrate that <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SFM</small> can effectively avoid 60%-80% of problematic failure handling and double throughput in more than half of failure instances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmc.2024.3477462
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Power Line Communications and Noise
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handling Failures in Secondary Radio Access Failure Handling in Operational 5G Networks

Yanbing Liu, Chunyi Peng
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
Power Line Communications and Noise
0.42
article

Handling Failures in Secondary Radio Access Failure Handling in Operational 5G Networks

Yanbing Liu, Chunyi Peng
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this work, we conduct a measurement study with three US operators to reveal three types of problematic failure handling on secondary radio access which have not been reported before. Compared to primary radio access failures, secondary radio access failures do not hurt radio access availability but significantly impact data performance, particularly when 5G is used as secondary radio access to boost throughput. Improper failure handling results in significant throughput loss, which is unnecessary in most instances. We then pinpoint the root causes behind these three types of problematic failure handling. When 5G provides higher throughput, failures are more likely to be falsely triggered by a specific event, causing the User Equipment (UE) to unnecessarily lose well-performing 5G connections. Moreover, after failures, the recovery of secondary radio access may fail due to inconsistent parameter settings or be delayed due to missing specific signaling fields. To address these issues, we propose SCGFailure Manager (<sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SFM</small>), a solution to optimize the detection and recovery of secondary radio access failures. Our evaluation results demonstrate that <sc xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">SFM</small> can effectively avoid 60%-80% of problematic failure handling and double throughput in more than half of failure instances.

IEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingVol. 24(2)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Power Line Communications and Noise
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.