Misuse Of Artificial Intelligence in Elections

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a double-edged sword in the realm of electoral processes, promising efficiency and accuracy while simultaneously casting a shadow on the integrity and fairness of democratic practices. This abstract delves into the intricate web of challenges posed by the misuse of AI in elections, shedding light on its potential for manipulation, polarization, and disenfranchisement. The proliferation of AI-driven algorithms in voter targeting and micro-targeted advertising has transformed the landscape of political campaigning, enabling unprecedented levels of personalized messaging. Social media platforms, fueled by AI algorithms, have become breeding grounds for echo chambers and filter bubbles, exacerbating societal polarization and undermining the foundation of informed democratic discourse. Moreover, the deployment of AI-powered predictive analytics for voter suppression tactics has further eroded the principles of free and fair elections. By leveraging sophisticated data analytics techniques, political actors can systematically identify and disenfranchise specific demographics, thereby subverting the fundamental right to vote. This nefarious application of AI not only undermines the legitimacy of electoral outcomes but also perpetuates systemic inequalities and undermines the democratic fabric of society. Furthermore, the opacity and lack of accountability surrounding AI algorithms used in electoral processes raise profound questions regarding transparency and oversight. The black-box nature of AI systems hampers meaningful scrutiny, making it challenging to detect and address instances of algorithmic bias, discrimination, and manipulation. Without robust regulatory frameworks and mechanisms for algorithmic accountability, the unchecked proliferation of AI in elections poses a significant threat to the principles of democratic governance and electoral integrity. Additionally, the advent of AI-generated deepfakes has introduced a new dimension of vulnerability to electoral integrity, enabling the fabrication of realistic yet entirely falsified audio and video content. In an era where perception often shapes reality, the dissemination of AI-generated deepfakes has the potential to undermine public trust in electoral processes, sow discord, and destabilize democratic institutions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59231/sari7758
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Misuse Of Artificial Intelligence in Elections

Jayant Jayant
1 citations
Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal
Misinformation and Its Impacts
1.13
article

Misuse Of Artificial Intelligence in Elections

Jayant Jayant
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a double-edged sword in the realm of electoral processes, promising efficiency and accuracy while simultaneously casting a shadow on the integrity and fairness of democratic practices. This abstract delves into the intricate web of challenges posed by the misuse of AI in elections, shedding light on its potential for manipulation, polarization, and disenfranchisement. The proliferation of AI-driven algorithms in voter targeting and micro-targeted advertising has transformed the landscape of political campaigning, enabling unprecedented levels of personalized messaging. Social media platforms, fueled by AI algorithms, have become breeding grounds for echo chambers and filter bubbles, exacerbating societal polarization and undermining the foundation of informed democratic discourse. Moreover, the deployment of AI-powered predictive analytics for voter suppression tactics has further eroded the principles of free and fair elections. By leveraging sophisticated data analytics techniques, political actors can systematically identify and disenfranchise specific demographics, thereby subverting the fundamental right to vote. This nefarious application of AI not only undermines the legitimacy of electoral outcomes but also perpetuates systemic inequalities and undermines the democratic fabric of society. Furthermore, the opacity and lack of accountability surrounding AI algorithms used in electoral processes raise profound questions regarding transparency and oversight. The black-box nature of AI systems hampers meaningful scrutiny, making it challenging to detect and address instances of algorithmic bias, discrimination, and manipulation. Without robust regulatory frameworks and mechanisms for algorithmic accountability, the unchecked proliferation of AI in elections poses a significant threat to the principles of democratic governance and electoral integrity. Additionally, the advent of AI-generated deepfakes has introduced a new dimension of vulnerability to electoral integrity, enabling the fabrication of realistic yet entirely falsified audio and video content. In an era where perception often shapes reality, the dissemination of AI-generated deepfakes has the potential to undermine public trust in electoral processes, sow discord, and destabilize democratic institutions.

Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary JournalVol. 03(04)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Misuse Of Artificial Intelligence in Elections — Jayant Jayant · Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS