Evaluation and Use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Reasoning and Classification Models to Support Clinical Trial Patient Identification and Enrollment in the Community Oncology Setting

Clinical trial research in oncology relies heavily on clinical documentation within the electronic medical record (EMR) to ascertain patient eligibility in clinical trials based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The structured data elements within the EMR serve as the primary information source for defining patient cohorts, with clinical cancer stage and performance status being two pivotal criteria determining trial eligibility. The challenge arises from the inconsistent availability of clinical stage and performance status data within the structured fields of the EMR despite their consistent presence in clinical notes. Additionally, there is a deficiency of standardization of this data that exists in the unstructured field. Hence, due to lack of structured data and standardization of said data, there are limitations in developing artificial intelligence (AI) models. To increase the comprehensiveness of clinical records, a clinical research team at a community oncology practice was consulted to identify requirements and extract essential clinical features from de-identified data. The methods outlined in this paper focused on eliminating false positives to allow future development of Large Language Models (LLM) using the outputted structured fields which resulted in an increase in patient record completeness with high accuracy. The accuracy ranged from 97.5-97.75% for the models that were developed. Out of the 60,000+ patients, the numerical staging, TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) staging, and Karnofsky performance score models added a structured field for 29.62%, 21.01%, and 40.64% patients respectively. Additionally, a semi-supervised NLP algorithm was applied on the performance status algorithm which achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.57. This work demonstrates the use case of natural language processing (NLP) in optimizing the clinical research enrollment process by providing an efficient and accurate method to detect key clinical values in unstructured patient data. Similar methodology with more advanced algorithms such as LLM can be employed to detect additional patient elements such as molecular biomarkers, imaging reports, postoperative surgical outcomes (i.e., clear margins etc.) and patient treatment outcomes using the extracted structured fields.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47912/jscdm.363
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation and Use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Reasoning and Classification Models to Support Clinical Trial Patient Identification and Enrollment in the Community Oncology Setting

1 citations
Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management
Intellectual Property Law
4.07
article

Evaluation and Use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) Reasoning and Classification Models to Support Clinical Trial Patient Identification and Enrollment in the Community Oncology Setting

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Clinical trial research in oncology relies heavily on clinical documentation within the electronic medical record (EMR) to ascertain patient eligibility in clinical trials based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The structured data elements within the EMR serve as the primary information source for defining patient cohorts, with clinical cancer stage and performance status being two pivotal criteria determining trial eligibility. The challenge arises from the inconsistent availability of clinical stage and performance status data within the structured fields of the EMR despite their consistent presence in clinical notes. Additionally, there is a deficiency of standardization of this data that exists in the unstructured field. Hence, due to lack of structured data and standardization of said data, there are limitations in developing artificial intelligence (AI) models. To increase the comprehensiveness of clinical records, a clinical research team at a community oncology practice was consulted to identify requirements and extract essential clinical features from de-identified data. The methods outlined in this paper focused on eliminating false positives to allow future development of Large Language Models (LLM) using the outputted structured fields which resulted in an increase in patient record completeness with high accuracy. The accuracy ranged from 97.5-97.75% for the models that were developed. Out of the 60,000+ patients, the numerical staging, TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) staging, and Karnofsky performance score models added a structured field for 29.62%, 21.01%, and 40.64% patients respectively. Additionally, a semi-supervised NLP algorithm was applied on the performance status algorithm which achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.57. This work demonstrates the use case of natural language processing (NLP) in optimizing the clinical research enrollment process by providing an efficient and accurate method to detect key clinical values in unstructured patient data. Similar methodology with more advanced algorithms such as LLM can be employed to detect additional patient elements such as molecular biomarkers, imaging reports, postoperative surgical outcomes (i.e., clear margins etc.) and patient treatment outcomes using the extracted structured fields.

Journal of the Society for Clinical Data ManagementVol. 0(1)
Xidian University (CN), Utah Cancer Specialists (US), Shaanxi Research Association for Women and Family (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Intellectual Property Law
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.