Predicting Mortality in Trauma Research: Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Scoring Tools in a South African Population

Background Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in low-resource settings, yet trauma severity scores are seldom validated in these contexts. There is a pressing need to better characterize and compare trauma scoring tools, especially within research frameworks. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of various trauma scoring tools in predicting in-hospital mortality among trauma patients in South Africa. Methods This study conducted a secondary analysis of existing data from the multicenter Epidemiology and Outcomes of Prolonged Trauma Care (EpiC) study, which included 13,548 adult trauma patients aged 18 years and older, collected between August 2021 and March 2024. The predictive ability of the scoring tools was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Results The mortality rate was 2.5% (n = 298). The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) demonstrated the highest predictive ability for seven-day in-hospital mortality, with an AUROC of 0.95 and an AUPRC of 0.53. Similarly, the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) also exhibited strong predictive capabilities, with AUROC values of 0.96 and AUPRC values of 0.62 for TRISS and an AUROC of 0.96 and AUPRC of 0.53 for NISS. In contrast, the Revised Trauma Score and Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure (MGAP) showed lower predictive performance, with AUROC values of 0.87 (AUPRC = 0.51) and 0.86 (AUPRC = 0.47), respectively. Conclusions The KTS exhibited optimal performance characteristics for retrospectively predicting mortality in our cohort, outperforming other scoring tools. Notably, it is also the simplest scoring tool, featuring the fewest variables compared to other trauma severity assessments. These findings highlight the necessity for external validation of trauma scoring tools in resource-limited populations to ensure their applicability and effectiveness in trauma research across diverse healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71225
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Mortality in Trauma Research: Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Scoring Tools in a South African Population

Bailey K. Fosdick, Hendrick J. Lategan, Willem Stassen, Julia Finn et al.
6 citations
Cureus
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
4.15
article

Predicting Mortality in Trauma Research: Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Scoring Tools in a South African Population

Bailey K. Fosdick, Hendrick J. Lategan, Willem Stassen, Julia Finn, Julia Dixon, Craig Wylie, Smitha Bhaumik, Nee‐Kofi Mould‐Millman, Steven Gremel Schauer, Shaheem de Vries, Mengli Xiao, Christopher E Collora
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Background Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in low-resource settings, yet trauma severity scores are seldom validated in these contexts. There is a pressing need to better characterize and compare trauma scoring tools, especially within research frameworks. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of various trauma scoring tools in predicting in-hospital mortality among trauma patients in South Africa. Methods This study conducted a secondary analysis of existing data from the multicenter Epidemiology and Outcomes of Prolonged Trauma Care (EpiC) study, which included 13,548 adult trauma patients aged 18 years and older, collected between August 2021 and March 2024. The predictive ability of the scoring tools was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Results The mortality rate was 2.5% (n = 298). The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) demonstrated the highest predictive ability for seven-day in-hospital mortality, with an AUROC of 0.95 and an AUPRC of 0.53. Similarly, the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) also exhibited strong predictive capabilities, with AUROC values of 0.96 and AUPRC values of 0.62 for TRISS and an AUROC of 0.96 and AUPRC of 0.53 for NISS. In contrast, the Revised Trauma Score and Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure (MGAP) showed lower predictive performance, with AUROC values of 0.87 (AUPRC = 0.51) and 0.86 (AUPRC = 0.47), respectively. Conclusions The KTS exhibited optimal performance characteristics for retrospectively predicting mortality in our cohort, outperforming other scoring tools. Notably, it is also the simplest scoring tool, featuring the fewest variables compared to other trauma severity assessments. These findings highlight the necessity for external validation of trauma scoring tools in resource-limited populations to ensure their applicability and effectiveness in trauma research across diverse healthcare settings.

CureusVol. 16(10)
Western Cape Department of Health (ZA), Colorado School of Public Health (US), University of Cape Town (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Right to Care (ZA), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.