Reimagining fishing in the Anthropocene through a rights of nature lens

How human society relates to and values the Ocean, generally, has direct implications for conservation. Overarching norms such as ‘Mare Liberum’ (Freedom of the Seas) and prevalent policy tools such as Maximum Sustainable Yield, have largely imagined ‘fisheries’ and/or nonhuman populations to be resources and property for human benefit and utility, an imperative limiting the potential of management to maintain healthy and thriving populations and prevent overfishing. Rights of Nature is emerging as an approach to reorient law around an ecocentric ethic where humankind is an element of Nature, and where Nature has inherent rights and intrinsic value. We explore how Rights of Nature might progressively shift traditional norms and values and provide a rethink of how law constructs and regulates human activity in the Ocean in the context of fishing. Our analysis suggests that Rights of Nature, or Ocean Rights, ensures the individuality, representation, and intrinsic value of marine wildlife and therefore provides an obligation to take effective measures to address unsustainable practices and to restore degraded ecosystems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Rights and the Environment
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2024.02.02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining fishing in the Anthropocene through a rights of nature lens

Michelle Bender, Rachel Bustamante
1 citations
Journal of Human Rights and the Environment
International Maritime Law Issues
0.71
article

Reimagining fishing in the Anthropocene through a rights of nature lens

Michelle Bender, Rachel Bustamante
article en
1 citations

Abstract

How human society relates to and values the Ocean, generally, has direct implications for conservation. Overarching norms such as ‘Mare Liberum’ (Freedom of the Seas) and prevalent policy tools such as Maximum Sustainable Yield, have largely imagined ‘fisheries’ and/or nonhuman populations to be resources and property for human benefit and utility, an imperative limiting the potential of management to maintain healthy and thriving populations and prevent overfishing. Rights of Nature is emerging as an approach to reorient law around an ecocentric ethic where humankind is an element of Nature, and where Nature has inherent rights and intrinsic value. We explore how Rights of Nature might progressively shift traditional norms and values and provide a rethink of how law constructs and regulates human activity in the Ocean in the context of fishing. Our analysis suggests that Rights of Nature, or Ocean Rights, ensures the individuality, representation, and intrinsic value of marine wildlife and therefore provides an obligation to take effective measures to address unsustainable practices and to restore degraded ecosystems.

Journal of Human Rights and the EnvironmentVol. 15(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
International Maritime Law Issues
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reimagining fishing in the Anthropocene through a rights of nature lens — Michelle Bender, Rachel Bustamante · Journal of Human Rights and the Environment (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS