Subjective Perceptions of Difference in Multi-level States: Regional Values, Embeddedness, and Bias in Canadian Provinces
Abstract Subnational variations in political culture and policy attitudes are a hallmark feature of multilevel systems of government, yet we know comparatively little about how and why citizens of these systems subjectively perceive regional differences in political values. Using data from a specially commissioned survey under the auspices of the Provincial Diversity Project, this article analyses subjective perceptions of difference across provinces in Canada. It shows that individuals believe their regions have distinct political values, but also that they systematically overestimate that difference. In their estimations of regional distinctiveness, individuals are informed by the value profiles of the regions in which they live, but also by their own policy preferences. The findings clarify the salience of internal boundaries within multilevel or federal states, and enable us to understand how myths of distinctiveness flourish, but also provide an important extension on debates about misperceptions in politics.
Authors
- Ailsa Henderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1818-5675)
- Antoine Bilodeau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9915-248X)
- Luc Turgeon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-3743)
- Stephen White (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4306-092X)
Institutions
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Concordia University (CA)
- Carleton University (CA)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Publius The Journal of Federalism
- Published
- 2024-10-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjae008
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Political Systems and Governance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.46
Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada