Epistemic Injustice in Budgetary Politics: A Response to Rachel Reeves's Mais Lecture

Abstract Rachel Reeves's March 2024 Mais lecture was an exercise in tempering hope that Britain's threadbare public services would soon be restored to health. The message of restraint might prove to be early confirmation of Reeves's instinctive governing philosophy, but it also reflected the fact that she was called upon to speak in a context of epistemic injustice. Senior Labour politicians must always accept greater scrutiny of their fiscal policy pronouncements than their Conservative counterparts. Their statements are also susceptible to disinformation, such that what Labour's opponents insist its frontbench team are hiding from the electorate often gets treated as a more authentic account of its plans than anything Labour says for itself.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13455
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemic Injustice in Budgetary Politics: A Response to Rachel Reeves's Mais Lecture

Matthew Watson
The Political Quarterly
Political Philosophy and Ethics
article

Epistemic Injustice in Budgetary Politics: A Response to Rachel Reeves's Mais Lecture

Matthew Watson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Rachel Reeves's March 2024 Mais lecture was an exercise in tempering hope that Britain's threadbare public services would soon be restored to health. The message of restraint might prove to be early confirmation of Reeves's instinctive governing philosophy, but it also reflected the fact that she was called upon to speak in a context of epistemic injustice. Senior Labour politicians must always accept greater scrutiny of their fiscal policy pronouncements than their Conservative counterparts. Their statements are also susceptible to disinformation, such that what Labour's opponents insist its frontbench team are hiding from the electorate often gets treated as a more authentic account of its plans than anything Labour says for itself.

The Political QuarterlyVol. 95(4)
Oxford University Press (United Kingdom) (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Epistemic Injustice in Budgetary Politics: A Response to Rachel Reeves's Mais Lecture — Matthew Watson · The Political Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS