Looking at the proposed Go/No-Go laser damage standard in the context of Gaussian beams

The TF7 Task Force of the US Optics and Electro-Optics Standards Council is responsible for laser damage standards and has proposed and is developing a Type 1 standard – that is, a “Go/No-Go” test to determine whether an optic, when exposed to specified laser irradiation, will likely have more or fewer damage sites according to requirements based on what constitutes system failure as determined by the user. The mathematical framework for this proposed standard assumed top-hat laser beams that probe a portion of the total area of an optic. This paper reports on some practical aspects and measurement uncertainties of laser damage test protocols and looks at pros and cons of using Gaussian beams in the proposed “Go/No-Go” tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3038207
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Optical Systems and Laser Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Looking at the proposed Go/No-Go laser damage standard in the context of Gaussian beams

John Curtis Bellum
1 citations
Optical Systems and Laser Technology
0.21
article

Looking at the proposed Go/No-Go laser damage standard in the context of Gaussian beams

John Curtis Bellum
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The TF7 Task Force of the US Optics and Electro-Optics Standards Council is responsible for laser damage standards and has proposed and is developing a Type 1 standard – that is, a “Go/No-Go” test to determine whether an optic, when exposed to specified laser irradiation, will likely have more or fewer damage sites according to requirements based on what constitutes system failure as determined by the user. The mathematical framework for this proposed standard assumed top-hat laser beams that probe a portion of the total area of an optic. This paper reports on some practical aspects and measurement uncertainties of laser damage test protocols and looks at pros and cons of using Gaussian beams in the proposed “Go/No-Go” tests.

Coherent (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Optical Systems and Laser Technology
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.