Exploring urban and agricultural land use planning

Socio-economic development has accelerated urban expansion, leading to the encroachment of urban space into agricultural space land and seriously undermining the stability of ecosystems. Scientifically optimizing the layout of urban-agricultural space can guarantee China's food security, promote urban development and maintain ecological stability. In this study, we focused on the rapidly growing city of Nankang. We used land, ecological and geographic location data to calculate land suitability, predicted future urban space through the GeoSOS-FLUS model, and finally optimized the agricultural-urban space conflict. The results show that: the areas of farmland with quality evaluation results for grades 1-4 were 7783.13 hm 2 , 9411.01 hm 2 , 8738.99 hm 2 and 3032.73 hm 2 , and the areas suitable for construction, more suitable for construction, unsuitable for construction and prohibited from construction accounted for 12.19%, 16.23%, 41.34% and 30.24%, respectively. Combining the FLUS model with the land suitability evaluation results, we found that there is a conflict area of 1841.96 hm 2 in the delineation scheme. Adjusting their layout according to the principle of conflict coordination, the optimized area of agricultural-urban space is 28429.34 hm 2 and 8968.23 hm 2 respectively, accounting for 16.32% and 5.15% of the study area. The result of spatial contradiction optimization satisfies the balance between production and residential space, promotes urban development, protects ecological security, and can provide scientific reference for regional urban ecological environment construction. • In our research, we choose multi-scenario indicators to construct a farmland quality evaluation system and a land construction suitability evaluation system to explore the suitable distribution area of agriculture-urban space. • The quality of farmland is the core of determining the spatial extent of agriculture, and the FLUS model was used to predict the UGB in 2035, spatially correct the UGB with the results of land building suitability, and delineate the most suitable space for urban development. • This study focuses on two questions: 1) How to optimize the spatial contradiction under the quality of resources, locational conditions, temporal and spatial changes, and simulation of future scenarios. 2) What is the best layout of the future urban-agricultural space?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103093
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring urban and agricultural land use planning

Zexu Chen, Huachun Dong
8 citations
Results in Engineering
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.26
article

Exploring urban and agricultural land use planning

Zexu Chen, Huachun Dong
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Socio-economic development has accelerated urban expansion, leading to the encroachment of urban space into agricultural space land and seriously undermining the stability of ecosystems. Scientifically optimizing the layout of urban-agricultural space can guarantee China's food security, promote urban development and maintain ecological stability. In this study, we focused on the rapidly growing city of Nankang. We used land, ecological and geographic location data to calculate land suitability, predicted future urban space through the GeoSOS-FLUS model, and finally optimized the agricultural-urban space conflict. The results show that: the areas of farmland with quality evaluation results for grades 1-4 were 7783.13 hm 2 , 9411.01 hm 2 , 8738.99 hm 2 and 3032.73 hm 2 , and the areas suitable for construction, more suitable for construction, unsuitable for construction and prohibited from construction accounted for 12.19%, 16.23%, 41.34% and 30.24%, respectively. Combining the FLUS model with the land suitability evaluation results, we found that there is a conflict area of 1841.96 hm 2 in the delineation scheme. Adjusting their layout according to the principle of conflict coordination, the optimized area of agricultural-urban space is 28429.34 hm 2 and 8968.23 hm 2 respectively, accounting for 16.32% and 5.15% of the study area. The result of spatial contradiction optimization satisfies the balance between production and residential space, promotes urban development, protects ecological security, and can provide scientific reference for regional urban ecological environment construction. • In our research, we choose multi-scenario indicators to construct a farmland quality evaluation system and a land construction suitability evaluation system to explore the suitable distribution area of agriculture-urban space. • The quality of farmland is the core of determining the spatial extent of agriculture, and the FLUS model was used to predict the UGB in 2035, spatially correct the UGB with the results of land building suitability, and delineate the most suitable space for urban development. • This study focuses on two questions: 1) How to optimize the spatial contradiction under the quality of resources, locational conditions, temporal and spatial changes, and simulation of future scenarios. 2) What is the best layout of the future urban-agricultural space?

Results in EngineeringVol. 24
Guangdong Polytechnic of Science and Technology (CN), Anshan Normal University (CN), Guangzhou Electronic Technology (China) (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.