Uncertainty in model estimates of global groundwater depth

Abstract Knowing the depth at which groundwater can be found below the land surface is critical for understanding its potential accessibility by ecosystems and society. Uncertainty in global scale water table depth (WTD) limits our ability to assess groundwater’s role in a water cycle altered by changing climate, land cover, and human water use. Global groundwater models offer a top–down pathway to gain this knowledge, but their uncertainty is currently poorly quantified. Here, we investigate four global groundwater models and reveal steady-state WTD disagreements of more than 100 m for one-third of the global land area. We find that model estimates of land areas with shallow groundwater at <10 m depth vary from 10% to 71% (mean of 23%). This uncertainty directly translates into subsequent assessments, as land areas with potential groundwater accessibility for forests, population, and areas equipped for irrigation, differ substantially depending on the chosen model. We explore reasons for these differences and find that contrary to observations, 3 out of 4 models show deeper water tables in humid than in arid climates and greatly overestimate how strongly topographic slope controls WTD. These results highlight substantial uncertainty associated with any global-scale groundwater analysis, which should be considered and ultimately reduced.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8587
Citations
28
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty in model estimates of global groundwater depth

Sebastian Gnann, Jarno Verkaik, Claudia Ruz Vargas, Tom Gleeson et al.
28 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
5.65
article

Uncertainty in model estimates of global groundwater depth

Sebastian Gnann, Jarno Verkaik, Claudia Ruz Vargas, Tom Gleeson, Edwin H. Sutanudjaja, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Gualbert Oude Essink, Thorsten Wagener, Marc F. P. Bierkens, Lina Stein
article en
28 citations

Abstract

Abstract Knowing the depth at which groundwater can be found below the land surface is critical for understanding its potential accessibility by ecosystems and society. Uncertainty in global scale water table depth (WTD) limits our ability to assess groundwater’s role in a water cycle altered by changing climate, land cover, and human water use. Global groundwater models offer a top–down pathway to gain this knowledge, but their uncertainty is currently poorly quantified. Here, we investigate four global groundwater models and reveal steady-state WTD disagreements of more than 100 m for one-third of the global land area. We find that model estimates of land areas with shallow groundwater at <10 m depth vary from 10% to 71% (mean of 23%). This uncertainty directly translates into subsequent assessments, as land areas with potential groundwater accessibility for forests, population, and areas equipped for irrigation, differ substantially depending on the chosen model. We explore reasons for these differences and find that contrary to observations, 3 out of 4 models show deeper water tables in humid than in arid climates and greatly overestimate how strongly topographic slope controls WTD. These results highlight substantial uncertainty associated with any global-scale groundwater analysis, which should be considered and ultimately reduced.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 19(11)
University of Freiburg (DE), University of Potsdam (DE), Utrecht University (NL), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University of Victoria (CA), Deltares (NL), IGRAC, Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.