Cholangioscopy-based convoluted neuronal network vs. confocal laser endomicroscopy in identification of neoplastic biliary strictures
<b>Background and study aims</b> Artificial intelligence (AI) models have demonstrated high diagnostic performance identifying neoplasia during digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC). To date, there are no studies directly comparing AI vs. DSOC-guided probe-base confocal laser endomicroscopy (DSOC-pCLE). Thus, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a DSOC-based AI model with DSOC-pCLE for identifying neoplasia in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures. <b>Patients and methods</b> This retrospective cohort-based diagnostic accuracy study included patients ≥ 18 years old who underwent DSOC and DSOC-pCLE (June 2014 to May 2022). Four methods were used to diagnose each patient's biliary structure, including DSOC direct visualization, DSOC-pCLE, an offline DSOC-based AI model analysis performed in DSOC recordings, and DSOC/pCLE-guided biopsies. The reference standard for neoplasia was a diagnosis based on further clinical evolution, imaging, or surgical specimen findings during a 12-month follow-up period. <b>Results</b> A total of 90 patients were included in the study. Eighty-six of 90 (95.5%) had neoplastic lesions including cholangiocarcinoma (98.8%) and tubulopapillary adenoma (1.2%). Four cases were inflammatory including two cases with chronic inflammation and two cases of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Compared with DSOC-AI, which obtained an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.79, DSOC direct visualization had an AUC of 0.74 ( <i>P</i> = 0.763), DSOC-pCLE had an AUC of 0.72 ( <i>P</i> = 0.634), and DSOC- and pCLE-guided biopsy had an AUC of 0.83 ( <i>P</i> = 0.809). <b>Conclusions</b> The DSOC-AI model demonstrated an offline diagnostic performance similar to that of DSOC-pCLE, DSOC alone, and DSOC/pCLE-guided biopsies. Larger multicenter, prospective, head-to-head trials with a proportional sample among neoplastic and nonneoplastic cases are advisable to confirm the obtained results.
Authors
- Martha Arevalo-Mora (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2561-8512)
- Daniela Tabacelia
- Miguel Puga-Tejada
- María Egas-Izquierdo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3031-0654)
- Jorge Baquerizo‐Burgos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6741-4211)
- Hannah Pitanga‐Lukashok (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-1321)
- Carlos Robles‐Medranda (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2434-3369)
- Domenica Cunto
- Juan C. Méndez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1658-400X)
- Juan Alcivar Vasquez
Institutions
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
- Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO)
- Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas (EC)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Endoscopy International Open
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2404-5699
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.51