How are decarbonization policies in the US and Canada shaping low-carbon ammonia production strategies?

Abstract The US and Canada contribute to 11% (22 million tons (Mt) per year) of global ammonia production, with an additional 42 Mt of production capacity currently planned or under construction. The distinct decarbonization policies adopted by these two countries—namely production tax credits in the US and carbon taxes in Canada—lead to significantly different outcomes and implications for decarbonized ammonia production strategies. This study evaluates facility-specific production strategies for low-carbon ammonia, considering the decarbonization policies of both countries. We assess the most cost-effective strategy for low-carbon ammonia production at each facility, both with and without the influence of these policies. Our results indicate that Canada’s carbon tax incentivizes the adoption of carbon capture and storage (CCS), while the US production tax credits promote the use of wind energy and biomass coupled with CCS, to produce hydrogen for ammonia synthesis. These findings highlight a dichotomy between the impacts of tax credits and carbon taxes: production tax credits facilitate the transition to low-carbon production methods, whereas carbon taxes incentivize existing facilities to upgrade with CCS technology. These insights underscore the effectiveness of tailored policy approaches and provide a comprehensive blueprint for other regions globally seeking to transition towards low-carbon ammonia production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad858c
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How are decarbonization policies in the US and Canada shaping low-carbon ammonia production strategies?

Stefano Mingolla, Lorenzo Rosa, Naomi L. Boness, Yannik Schueler
8 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
0.86
article

How are decarbonization policies in the US and Canada shaping low-carbon ammonia production strategies?

Stefano Mingolla, Lorenzo Rosa, Naomi L. Boness, Yannik Schueler
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The US and Canada contribute to 11% (22 million tons (Mt) per year) of global ammonia production, with an additional 42 Mt of production capacity currently planned or under construction. The distinct decarbonization policies adopted by these two countries—namely production tax credits in the US and carbon taxes in Canada—lead to significantly different outcomes and implications for decarbonized ammonia production strategies. This study evaluates facility-specific production strategies for low-carbon ammonia, considering the decarbonization policies of both countries. We assess the most cost-effective strategy for low-carbon ammonia production at each facility, both with and without the influence of these policies. Our results indicate that Canada’s carbon tax incentivizes the adoption of carbon capture and storage (CCS), while the US production tax credits promote the use of wind energy and biomass coupled with CCS, to produce hydrogen for ammonia synthesis. These findings highlight a dichotomy between the impacts of tax credits and carbon taxes: production tax credits facilitate the transition to low-carbon production methods, whereas carbon taxes incentivize existing facilities to upgrade with CCS technology. These insights underscore the effectiveness of tailored policy approaches and provide a comprehensive blueprint for other regions globally seeking to transition towards low-carbon ammonia production.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 19(11)
Carnegie Institution for Science (US), Stanford University (US)
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
0.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.