Is Geopolitical Risk a Reason or Excuse for Bigger Military Expenditures?

Abstract This study aims to investigate the relationship between military expenditures and geopolitical risk using the Panel Fourier Toda-Yamamoto Causality test over the 1993–2020 period. Considering structural changes, the findings reveal that geopolitical risk fluctuations in Colombia, India, South Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, and the USA affect military expenditures. Conversely, the results point out that for Chile, Israel, Russia, Taiwan, and the UK, military expenditures appear to cause geopolitical risk. This highlights that changes in military spending across nations trigger an arms race due to the perception of increased threat by neighbours and/or interest groups. In a nutshell, the results show a complex interplay between military expenditures and geopolitical risk, where changes in one can affect the other. Based upon this, policymakers must prioritize diplomacy, utilize international mediation/peacekeeping initiatives, develop military alliances, and commit to non-threatening military expenditures for regional stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2024-0027
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Geopolitical Risk a Reason or Excuse for Bigger Military Expenditures?

Asiye TÜTÜNCÜ, Khalid Khan, Yaşar Bayraktar
6 citations
Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
6.78
article

Is Geopolitical Risk a Reason or Excuse for Bigger Military Expenditures?

Asiye TÜTÜNCÜ, Khalid Khan, Yaşar Bayraktar
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to investigate the relationship between military expenditures and geopolitical risk using the Panel Fourier Toda-Yamamoto Causality test over the 1993–2020 period. Considering structural changes, the findings reveal that geopolitical risk fluctuations in Colombia, India, South Korea, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Ukraine, and the USA affect military expenditures. Conversely, the results point out that for Chile, Israel, Russia, Taiwan, and the UK, military expenditures appear to cause geopolitical risk. This highlights that changes in military spending across nations trigger an arms race due to the perception of increased threat by neighbours and/or interest groups. In a nutshell, the results show a complex interplay between military expenditures and geopolitical risk, where changes in one can affect the other. Based upon this, policymakers must prioritize diplomacy, utilize international mediation/peacekeeping initiatives, develop military alliances, and commit to non-threatening military expenditures for regional stability.

Peace Economics Peace Science and Public PolicyVol. 30(4)
Birmingham City University (GB), Qilu University of Technology (CN), Kastamonu University (TR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
6.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is Geopolitical Risk a Reason or Excuse for Bigger Military Expenditures? — Asiye TÜTÜNCÜ, Khalid Khan, et al. · Peace Economics Peace Science and Public Policy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS