Regulating for trustworthy autonomous systems: exploring stakeholder perspectives on answerability

Abstract The proliferation of autonomous and semi‐autonomous systems (AS) poses important and pressing regulatory challenges. Underpinning these is the recognition that many different stakeholders will need to trust systems to ensure their effective adoption and implementation. However, research on stakeholder perspectives is lacking, and assessing trustworthiness is difficult due to ‘responsibility gaps’ where it is unclear where responsibility for harms arising from AS ought to lie. Bridging these gaps is important because holding one another responsible is how social trust is maintained, and trust is vital to unlocking the promise that AS hold. This article considers how the concept of answerability could provide a useful framework for boosting the trustworthiness of AS. We present findings from a series of stakeholder interviews identifying what answers different stakeholders need to trust AS in health, finance, and government applications, and consider the implications of our research for current proposals for regulating AS in the United Kingdom and the European Union.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Society
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12501
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulating for trustworthy autonomous systems: exploring stakeholder perspectives on answerability

Nayha Sethi, Louise Hatherall
3 citations
Journal of Law and Society
Regulation and Compliance Studies
1.66
article

Regulating for trustworthy autonomous systems: exploring stakeholder perspectives on answerability

Nayha Sethi, Louise Hatherall
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The proliferation of autonomous and semi‐autonomous systems (AS) poses important and pressing regulatory challenges. Underpinning these is the recognition that many different stakeholders will need to trust systems to ensure their effective adoption and implementation. However, research on stakeholder perspectives is lacking, and assessing trustworthiness is difficult due to ‘responsibility gaps’ where it is unclear where responsibility for harms arising from AS ought to lie. Bridging these gaps is important because holding one another responsible is how social trust is maintained, and trust is vital to unlocking the promise that AS hold. This article considers how the concept of answerability could provide a useful framework for boosting the trustworthiness of AS. We present findings from a series of stakeholder interviews identifying what answers different stakeholders need to trust AS in health, finance, and government applications, and consider the implications of our research for current proposals for regulating AS in the United Kingdom and the European Union.

Journal of Law and SocietyVol. 51(4)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.