Off-grid PV/biomass/DG/battery hybrid renewable energy as a source of electricity for a farm facility

• An Overview of the Load Demand Models of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Technical Examination of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Economic Examination of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Environmental Analysis of the Energy System • Discussion of the Reliability Analysis for the Optimal Operations of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Variability of the Hybrid Energy System to Change in Input Parameters Reliable, cost-effective energy systems are pivotal for sustainable development in the agricultural sector. Using the energy balance analysis of the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewable (HOMER), this study presents a techno-economic assessment of a hybrid renewable energy system for a farm facility. The energy system components considered in the analysis include solar photovoltaics, wind turbines, diesel generators, biomass, and battery storage. The results shows that ten feasible energy systems can technically power the typical farm facility, with a PV-Biomass-DG battery being the best in terms of the total net present cost. The PV-Biomass-DG-battery systems consist of 561.023 kW of PV, 88 kW of diesel generator, 10 kW of biomass, 81 kW of converter, and 584 batteries operated in a load-following mode. When the cost of energy (COE) of EA1 0.206325 $/kWh is compared to EA7 0.407681 $/kWh, a difference of $0.201356 will be saved for every kWh. Also, a comparison of the operating cost of EA1, $65,713.23 and the operating cost of EA7 $212,027.4 showed a margin of $146,314.17 being saved. Energy systems EA3 and EA4 had the lowest carbon dioxide production levels of 15.8 kg annually, respectively. The simple payback period metrics increased from EA1 to EA6 between 2.97 years to 6.99 years. The result of the study shows that adopting a low-carbon energy transition is technically and economically viable for the agricultural sector, especially in developing countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100808
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Off-grid PV/biomass/DG/battery hybrid renewable energy as a source of electricity for a farm facility

Michael Uzoamaka Emezirinwune, Oluwaseun Ibrahim Adebisi, Isaiah Adediji Adejumobi, Festus Gboyega Akinboro
12 citations
e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
2.03
article

Off-grid PV/biomass/DG/battery hybrid renewable energy as a source of electricity for a farm facility

Michael Uzoamaka Emezirinwune, Oluwaseun Ibrahim Adebisi, Isaiah Adediji Adejumobi, Festus Gboyega Akinboro
article en
12 citations

Abstract

• An Overview of the Load Demand Models of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Technical Examination of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Economic Examination of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Environmental Analysis of the Energy System • Discussion of the Reliability Analysis for the Optimal Operations of the Hybrid Energy System • Discussion of the Variability of the Hybrid Energy System to Change in Input Parameters Reliable, cost-effective energy systems are pivotal for sustainable development in the agricultural sector. Using the energy balance analysis of the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewable (HOMER), this study presents a techno-economic assessment of a hybrid renewable energy system for a farm facility. The energy system components considered in the analysis include solar photovoltaics, wind turbines, diesel generators, biomass, and battery storage. The results shows that ten feasible energy systems can technically power the typical farm facility, with a PV-Biomass-DG battery being the best in terms of the total net present cost. The PV-Biomass-DG-battery systems consist of 561.023 kW of PV, 88 kW of diesel generator, 10 kW of biomass, 81 kW of converter, and 584 batteries operated in a load-following mode. When the cost of energy (COE) of EA1 0.206325 $/kWh is compared to EA7 0.407681 $/kWh, a difference of $0.201356 will be saved for every kWh. Also, a comparison of the operating cost of EA1, $65,713.23 and the operating cost of EA7 $212,027.4 showed a margin of $146,314.17 being saved. Energy systems EA3 and EA4 had the lowest carbon dioxide production levels of 15.8 kg annually, respectively. The simple payback period metrics increased from EA1 to EA6 between 2.97 years to 6.99 years. The result of the study shows that adopting a low-carbon energy transition is technically and economically viable for the agricultural sector, especially in developing countries.

e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and EnergyVol. 10
Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (NG), Physical Sciences (United States) (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
2.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.