Conceptual and methodological considerations to the negative footprint illusion: a reply to Gorissen et al. (2024)

When asked to estimate the carbon footprint of a bundle of low carbon footprint and high carbon footprint items, people typically report a lower value compared to estimating the high carbon footprint items alone. This finding is called the negative footprint illusion. Previous research suggests that people might be made less susceptible to this effect depending on whether they are asked to evaluate how environmentally friendly or how environmentally damaging the items are. In the current study, we used large instead of small stimulus sets (i.e. a more powerful experimental manipulation than that in previous research) and show under these circumstances it does not matter whether participants are required to make friendliness or damaging estimates. The role of attribute substitution along with other conceptual and methodological issues to the negative footprint illusion are discussed, particularly in relation to a recent paper by Gorissen et al. [2024. Green versus grey framing: Exploring the mechanism behind the negative footprint illusion in environmental sustainability assessments. Sustainability, 16(4), 1411].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2024.2412030
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual and methodological considerations to the negative footprint illusion: a reply to Gorissen et al. (2024)

John Everett Marsh, Patrik Sörqvist
2 citations
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
0.92
article

Conceptual and methodological considerations to the negative footprint illusion: a reply to Gorissen et al. (2024)

John Everett Marsh, Patrik Sörqvist
article en
2 citations

Abstract

When asked to estimate the carbon footprint of a bundle of low carbon footprint and high carbon footprint items, people typically report a lower value compared to estimating the high carbon footprint items alone. This finding is called the negative footprint illusion. Previous research suggests that people might be made less susceptible to this effect depending on whether they are asked to evaluate how environmentally friendly or how environmentally damaging the items are. In the current study, we used large instead of small stimulus sets (i.e. a more powerful experimental manipulation than that in previous research) and show under these circumstances it does not matter whether participants are required to make friendliness or damaging estimates. The role of attribute substitution along with other conceptual and methodological issues to the negative footprint illusion are discussed, particularly in relation to a recent paper by Gorissen et al. [2024. Green versus grey framing: Exploring the mechanism behind the negative footprint illusion in environmental sustainability assessments. Sustainability, 16(4), 1411].

Journal of Cognitive PsychologyVol. 36(8)
University of Lancashire (GB), Luleå University of Technology (SE), University of Gävle (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptual and methodological considerations to the negative footprint illusion: a reply to Gorissen et al. (2024) — John Everett Marsh, Patrik Sörqvist · Journal of Cognitive Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS