Evaluating cross‐sectional geometry‐based methodologies on an archaeological and historical sample

Abstract The construction of a complete biological profile for unknown individuals from skeletal remains plays a key role in the holistic study of archaeological sites. However, the presence of commingled elements, as in the case of mass graves, hinders this process. This work aims to evaluate the diaphyseal cross‐sectional geometric properties of the long bones for pair‐matching and for sex estimation based on the femur, tibia, and humerus bones on archaeological and historical samples. The sample consisted of 3D virtual bone models of 95 individuals (46 males, 39 females, 10 of unknown sex) from both Greek and English assemblages, utilizing the dedicated “csg‐toolkit” GNU Octave package for variable extraction. The pair‐matching sorting algorithm performed adequately in all three assemblages, excluding over 97% of the true mismatched pairs. The accuracy rate for certain pair detection was close to 50% for the lower limbs, and 41% for the humerus, with the algorithm deeming a significant amount of the missed pairs as plausible, resulting in 70% to 80% of total pairs to be detected in some capacity for all bone assemblages. The sex estimation classifiers performed sufficiently in all cases, yielding moderately high accuracy rates in the majority of examined samples, with values consistently higher than 70%. However, the application of contemporary methods on archaeological or historical material needs to be performed with caution, as secular changes and population‐specific trends can affect the applicability of the methods. As such, the utilization of different techniques before reaching a conclusion is vital and should be encouraged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.3359
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating cross‐sectional geometry‐based methodologies on an archaeological and historical sample

Vasileios Pierros, Maria‐Eleni Chovalopoulou, Nefeli Garoufi, Vasileios Rovinas
1 citations
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
0.25
article

Evaluating cross‐sectional geometry‐based methodologies on an archaeological and historical sample

Vasileios Pierros, Maria‐Eleni Chovalopoulou, Nefeli Garoufi, Vasileios Rovinas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The construction of a complete biological profile for unknown individuals from skeletal remains plays a key role in the holistic study of archaeological sites. However, the presence of commingled elements, as in the case of mass graves, hinders this process. This work aims to evaluate the diaphyseal cross‐sectional geometric properties of the long bones for pair‐matching and for sex estimation based on the femur, tibia, and humerus bones on archaeological and historical samples. The sample consisted of 3D virtual bone models of 95 individuals (46 males, 39 females, 10 of unknown sex) from both Greek and English assemblages, utilizing the dedicated “csg‐toolkit” GNU Octave package for variable extraction. The pair‐matching sorting algorithm performed adequately in all three assemblages, excluding over 97% of the true mismatched pairs. The accuracy rate for certain pair detection was close to 50% for the lower limbs, and 41% for the humerus, with the algorithm deeming a significant amount of the missed pairs as plausible, resulting in 70% to 80% of total pairs to be detected in some capacity for all bone assemblages. The sex estimation classifiers performed sufficiently in all cases, yielding moderately high accuracy rates in the majority of examined samples, with values consistently higher than 70%. However, the application of contemporary methods on archaeological or historical material needs to be performed with caution, as secular changes and population‐specific trends can affect the applicability of the methods. As such, the utilization of different techniques before reaching a conclusion is vital and should be encouraged.

International Journal of OsteoarchaeologyVol. 34(6)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating cross‐sectional geometry‐based methodologies on an archaeological and historical sample — Vasileios Pierros, Maria‐Eleni Chovalopoulou, et al. · International Journal of Osteoarchaeology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS