Calculation of in-situ steady-state heat flux on EAST lower divertor
• In-situ heat flux calculations are the basis for analyzing the damage mechanisms of plasma facing components, for evaluating critical heat flux issues and for studying the plasma physics problems. • The infrared based heat flux calculation result of peak flux is consistent with that of probe data, with much better spatial resolution. The λ q of #123059 under 10 MW heating source power can help to update the scaling formula of decay length. • Using Fluent 3D fluid–structure coupling calculation. Heat flux is a key issue in tokamak devices. The non-uniform high heat flux on Plasma-Facing Components (PFCs) has led to local severe damage, including cracks and melting, in current tokamaks such as EAST and WEST. To characterize the non-uniform heat flux loading on the divertor surfaces, the parallel incident heat flux q ‖ , the decay length λ q along the radial direction and the Gaussian spreading width S are used. The q ‖ can lead to a very high peak heat flux loading on the divertor surfaces, which may cause critical heat flux problems. Additionally, the decay length is a key consideration for future tokamak designs like ITER. Every effort on the present tokamak devices contributes to updating the scaling of the heat flux. In EAST, a calculation method based on a high spatial resolution IR camera is employed to obtain the heat flux and decay length. The main process involves comparing the surface temperature distribution calculated by Fluent simulation with that measured by an infrared camera. Taking a high heating source discharge (#123059 ∼ 10 MW heating source) as an example, the heat flux is as follows: q ‖ = 216 - 14 + 19 MW/m 2 , with λ q = 6.2 - 1.1 + 1 mm, and S = 1.2 ± 0.4 mm; it is in line with Langmuir probe data. The infrared-based heat flux calculation method can calculate the peak incident heat flux and the decay length simultaneously, its result can help to update the scaling model of heat flux, thus not only helping to improve the present device but also offering important reference for future tokamaks
Authors
- Qingquan Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6354-1408)
- Yongqi Gu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0440-702X)
- Guoliang Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-7216)
- Gaoting Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2760-113X)
- L.Y. Meng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8633-5383)
- Baoguo Wang
- Rong Yan
- Chunyu He (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-6506)
- Rui Ding (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2880-9736)
- Yang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-1514)
- Junling Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-9967)
- Dahuan Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6655-1372)
- Binfu Gao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-5229)
Institutions
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Donghua University (CN)
- Hefei Institutes of Physical Science (CN)
- Institute of Plasma Physics (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nuclear Materials and Energy
- Published
- 2024-10-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nme.2024.101763
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.96