Sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in COVID-19 testing guidelines

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Sweden emphasized voluntary guidelines over mandates. We exploited a rapid change and reversal of the Public Health Agency of Sweden's COVID-19 testing guidelines for vaccinated and recently infected individuals as a quasi-experiment to examine sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in pandemic guidelines. We analyzed daily polymerase chain reaction tests from 1 October 2021 to 15 December 2021, for vaccinated or recently infected adults (≥20 years; n = 1 596 321) from three Swedish regions (Stockholm, Örebro, and Dalarna). Using interrupted time series analysis, we estimated abrupt changes in testing rates at the two dates when the guidelines were changed (1 November and 22 November). Stratified analysis and meta-regression were employed to explore sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response to the guideline changes. Testing rates declined substantially when guideline against testing of vaccinated and recently infected individuals came into effect on 1 November [testing rate ratio: 0.50 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.41, 0.61)], and increased again from these lowered levels by a similar amount upon its reversal on 22 November [testing rate ratio: 2.19 (95% CI: 1.69, 2.85)]. Being Sweden-born, having higher household income, or higher education, were all associated with a stronger adherent response to the guideline changes. Adjusting for stratum-specific baseline testing rates and test-positivity did not influence the results. Our findings suggest that the population was responsive to the rapid changes in testing guidelines, but with clear sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae145
Citations
2
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in COVID-19 testing guidelines

Chioma Nwaru, Fredrik Nyberg, Jonas Björk, Shambhavi Sharma et al.
2 citations
European Journal of Public Health
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
0.57
article

Sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in COVID-19 testing guidelines

Chioma Nwaru, Fredrik Nyberg, Jonas Björk, Shambhavi Sharma, Magnus Gisslén, Carl Bonander, Anton Nilsson, Niklas Hammar, Huiqi Li, Jesper Löve, Sara Byfors
article en
2 citations

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Sweden emphasized voluntary guidelines over mandates. We exploited a rapid change and reversal of the Public Health Agency of Sweden's COVID-19 testing guidelines for vaccinated and recently infected individuals as a quasi-experiment to examine sociodemographic differences in the response to changes in pandemic guidelines. We analyzed daily polymerase chain reaction tests from 1 October 2021 to 15 December 2021, for vaccinated or recently infected adults (≥20 years; n = 1 596 321) from three Swedish regions (Stockholm, Örebro, and Dalarna). Using interrupted time series analysis, we estimated abrupt changes in testing rates at the two dates when the guidelines were changed (1 November and 22 November). Stratified analysis and meta-regression were employed to explore sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response to the guideline changes. Testing rates declined substantially when guideline against testing of vaccinated and recently infected individuals came into effect on 1 November [testing rate ratio: 0.50 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.41, 0.61)], and increased again from these lowered levels by a similar amount upon its reversal on 22 November [testing rate ratio: 2.19 (95% CI: 1.69, 2.85)]. Being Sweden-born, having higher household income, or higher education, were all associated with a stronger adherent response to the guideline changes. Adjusting for stratum-specific baseline testing rates and test-positivity did not influence the results. Our findings suggest that the population was responsive to the rapid changes in testing guidelines, but with clear sociodemographic differences in the strength of the response.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 34(6)
Public Health Agency of Sweden (SE), Lund University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Region Västra Götaland (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Karlstad University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Lunds Universitet, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Uppsala Universitet, Science for Life Laboratory
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.