Mutual trust between German meat sector stakeholders and animal welfare and environmentalist NGOs regarding multi-stakeholder policies for sustainable meat production

Excessive meat production and consumption (especially in high-income countries) are linked to global sustainability hazards, such as climate change. Yet, sustainable meat production constitutes a wicked problem (i.e., a problem resistant to final resolution with diverging interests by relevant stakeholders) and political intervention accordingly has remained limited. To tackle wickedness, scholars recommend policy formats that embrace diversity and complexity among stakeholders, so-called MSESs. Trust is said to facilitate stakeholder cooperation and ranks among the key ingredients to and outcomes of effective MSESs. Yet, trust remains under-conceptualized in the research that foregrounds MSESs vis-a-vis sustainable meat production. Thus, to test for stakeholders’ willingness to cooperate in MSESs aimed at sustainable meat production, our research applied a seminal trust concept to probe mutual trust between core stakeholders of the meat supply chain. Focusing on Germany, we investigated the relationship between those stakeholders assumed to share rather fragile bonds (i.e., representatives of meat production and of non-governmental organizations that advocate environmental and animal welfare causes). Using semi-structured interviews we interviewed both parties about their relationship, their opinion about MSESs and their willingness to cooperate with each other in them. Interview results were triangulated with secondary data. Our findings indicate limited trust by each party with the meat sector possibly being less trusting. They also reveal characteristics that may diminish trust in the eyes of each party. Our work further indicates acceptance of MSESs by both parties and suggests core characteristics that are relevant to the success of MSESs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143929
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mutual trust between German meat sector stakeholders and animal welfare and environmentalist NGOs regarding multi-stakeholder policies for sustainable meat production

Gesa Busch, Alexander Schwarz, Ramona Weinrich
2 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
0.92
article

Mutual trust between German meat sector stakeholders and animal welfare and environmentalist NGOs regarding multi-stakeholder policies for sustainable meat production

Gesa Busch, Alexander Schwarz, Ramona Weinrich
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Excessive meat production and consumption (especially in high-income countries) are linked to global sustainability hazards, such as climate change. Yet, sustainable meat production constitutes a wicked problem (i.e., a problem resistant to final resolution with diverging interests by relevant stakeholders) and political intervention accordingly has remained limited. To tackle wickedness, scholars recommend policy formats that embrace diversity and complexity among stakeholders, so-called MSESs. Trust is said to facilitate stakeholder cooperation and ranks among the key ingredients to and outcomes of effective MSESs. Yet, trust remains under-conceptualized in the research that foregrounds MSESs vis-a-vis sustainable meat production. Thus, to test for stakeholders’ willingness to cooperate in MSESs aimed at sustainable meat production, our research applied a seminal trust concept to probe mutual trust between core stakeholders of the meat supply chain. Focusing on Germany, we investigated the relationship between those stakeholders assumed to share rather fragile bonds (i.e., representatives of meat production and of non-governmental organizations that advocate environmental and animal welfare causes). Using semi-structured interviews we interviewed both parties about their relationship, their opinion about MSESs and their willingness to cooperate with each other in them. Interview results were triangulated with secondary data. Our findings indicate limited trust by each party with the meat sector possibly being less trusting. They also reveal characteristics that may diminish trust in the eyes of each party. Our work further indicates acceptance of MSESs by both parties and suggests core characteristics that are relevant to the success of MSESs.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 479
University of Hohenheim (DE), Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.