ChatGPT M.D.: Is there any room for generative AI in neurology?

ChatGPT, a general artificial intelligence, has been recognized as a powerful tool in scientific writing and programming but its use as a medical tool is largely overlooked. The general accessibility, rapid response time and comprehensive training database might enable ChatGPT to serve as a diagnostic augmentation tool in certain clinical settings. The diagnostic process in neurology is often challenging and complex. In certain time-sensitive scenarios, rapid evaluation and diagnostic decisions are needed, while in other cases clinicians are faced with rare disorders and atypical disease manifestations. Due to these factors, the diagnostic accuracy in neurology is often suboptimal. Here we evaluated whether ChatGPT can be utilized as a valuable and innovative diagnostic augmentation tool in various neurological settings. We used synthetic data generated by neurological experts to represent descriptive anamneses of patients with known neurology-related diseases, then the probability for an appropriate diagnosis made by ChatGPT was measured. To give clarity to the accuracy of the AI-determined diagnosis, all cases have been cross-validated by other experts and general medical doctors as well. We found that ChatGPT-determined diagnostic accuracy (ranging from 68.5% ± 3.28% to 83.83% ± 2.73%) can reach the accuracy of other experts (81.66% ± 2.02%), furthermore, it surpasses the probability of an appropriate diagnosis if the examiner is a general medical doctor (57.15% ± 2.64%). Our results showcase the efficacy of general artificial intelligence like ChatGPT as a diagnostic augmentation tool in medicine. In the future, AI-based supporting tools might be useful amendments in medical practice and help to improve the diagnostic process in neurology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310028
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT M.D.: Is there any room for generative AI in neurology?

Zalán Kádár, Zsófia Bősze, Anett Csáti, László Siklós et al.
12 citations
PLoS ONE
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.32
article

ChatGPT M.D.: Is there any room for generative AI in neurology?

Zalán Kádár, Zsófia Bősze, Anett Csáti, László Siklós, Bernát Nógrádi, László Szpisjak, Máté Tóth, Roland Patai, Tamás F. Polgár, Péter Klivènyi, Barbara Erdélyi-Furka, Péter Hertelendy, Valéria Meszlényi, Krisztina Boda, Fanny Molnár, Dóra Halmi, Dávid Tóth
article en
12 citations

Abstract

ChatGPT, a general artificial intelligence, has been recognized as a powerful tool in scientific writing and programming but its use as a medical tool is largely overlooked. The general accessibility, rapid response time and comprehensive training database might enable ChatGPT to serve as a diagnostic augmentation tool in certain clinical settings. The diagnostic process in neurology is often challenging and complex. In certain time-sensitive scenarios, rapid evaluation and diagnostic decisions are needed, while in other cases clinicians are faced with rare disorders and atypical disease manifestations. Due to these factors, the diagnostic accuracy in neurology is often suboptimal. Here we evaluated whether ChatGPT can be utilized as a valuable and innovative diagnostic augmentation tool in various neurological settings. We used synthetic data generated by neurological experts to represent descriptive anamneses of patients with known neurology-related diseases, then the probability for an appropriate diagnosis made by ChatGPT was measured. To give clarity to the accuracy of the AI-determined diagnosis, all cases have been cross-validated by other experts and general medical doctors as well. We found that ChatGPT-determined diagnostic accuracy (ranging from 68.5% ± 3.28% to 83.83% ± 2.73%) can reach the accuracy of other experts (81.66% ± 2.02%), furthermore, it surpasses the probability of an appropriate diagnosis if the examiner is a general medical doctor (57.15% ± 2.64%). Our results showcase the efficacy of general artificial intelligence like ChatGPT as a diagnostic augmentation tool in medicine. In the future, AI-based supporting tools might be useful amendments in medical practice and help to improve the diagnostic process in neurology.

PLoS ONEVol. 19(10)
University of Szeged (HU), HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont (HU), Institute of Biophysics (HU)
Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, Emberi Eroforrások Minisztériuma, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Magyarország Kormánya
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.