Impact of a New Preoperative Stratification Based on Cardiac Structural Compromise in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery

<b>Introduction and objectives:</b> Aortic valve replacement surgery (SAVR) remains a recommended indication, though its pre-surgical stratification is an ongoing challenge. Despite the widespread use of scores like the STS and EuroSCORE II, they have a number of limitations, while often neglecting structural parameters like left ventricular hypertrophy or left atrium volume. This study aimed to evaluate whether a new adaptation of the Généreux classification in the preoperative risk stratification of severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with the primary outcome, and to compare it with the original classification versus the traditional scores in short- and long-term follow-up. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving patients with confirmed severe AS who underwent SAVR. The new stratification categorized patients into three stages. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with mortality, with survival analysis performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> A total of 508 patients were included. Stage 3 patients had a lower median age (67 years). The median EuroSCORE II and STS scores were 2.75 and 2.62%, respectively (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 81 months, 56 deaths occurred (11%). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed significant differences in all-cause mortality among the three groups (HR 4.073, log-rank <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the three preoperative stages (HR 3.22, [95% CI 1.44-7.20], <i>p</i> = 0.004) and mean transaortic gradient (HR 0.96, [95% CI 0.92-0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.021) as independent variables of mortality. The original Généreux scale AUC was higher (AUC: 0.760, 95% CI: 0.692-0.829) compared to the modified Généreux scale (AUC: 0.758, 95% CI: 0.687-0.829). However, no statistical differences were found between the different scales. <b>Conclusions:</b> Preoperative three-stage classification and low transaortic gradient are factors associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients undergoing SAVR. The proposed staging system performed better in the mortality analysis than EuroSCORE II and STS and was similar to the original classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14192250
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a New Preoperative Stratification Based on Cardiac Structural Compromise in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery

Cristhian Espinoza Romero, Flávio Tarasoutchi, Vitor Emer Egypto Rosa, Guilherme Sobreira Spina et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.80
article

Impact of a New Preoperative Stratification Based on Cardiac Structural Compromise in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement Surgery

Cristhian Espinoza Romero, Flávio Tarasoutchi, Vitor Emer Egypto Rosa, Guilherme Sobreira Spina, João Ricardo Cordeiro Fernandes, Roney Orismar Sampaio, Bryan Nicolalde, Antonio Sérgio de Santis Andrade Lopes, Sérgio Octavio Kormann
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction and objectives:</b> Aortic valve replacement surgery (SAVR) remains a recommended indication, though its pre-surgical stratification is an ongoing challenge. Despite the widespread use of scores like the STS and EuroSCORE II, they have a number of limitations, while often neglecting structural parameters like left ventricular hypertrophy or left atrium volume. This study aimed to evaluate whether a new adaptation of the Généreux classification in the preoperative risk stratification of severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with the primary outcome, and to compare it with the original classification versus the traditional scores in short- and long-term follow-up. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving patients with confirmed severe AS who underwent SAVR. The new stratification categorized patients into three stages. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with mortality, with survival analysis performed using Kaplan-Meier curves. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. <b>Results:</b> A total of 508 patients were included. Stage 3 patients had a lower median age (67 years). The median EuroSCORE II and STS scores were 2.75 and 2.62%, respectively (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Over a median follow-up of 81 months, 56 deaths occurred (11%). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed significant differences in all-cause mortality among the three groups (HR 4.073, log-rank <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the three preoperative stages (HR 3.22, [95% CI 1.44-7.20], <i>p</i> = 0.004) and mean transaortic gradient (HR 0.96, [95% CI 0.92-0.99], <i>p</i> = 0.021) as independent variables of mortality. The original Généreux scale AUC was higher (AUC: 0.760, 95% CI: 0.692-0.829) compared to the modified Généreux scale (AUC: 0.758, 95% CI: 0.687-0.829). However, no statistical differences were found between the different scales. <b>Conclusions:</b> Preoperative three-stage classification and low transaortic gradient are factors associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients undergoing SAVR. The proposed staging system performed better in the mortality analysis than EuroSCORE II and STS and was similar to the original classification.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(19)
Norwalk Hospital (US), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.