Enhanced Dataset Synthesis Using CTGAN for Metagenomic Dataset
The examination of bacterial communities has increasingly relied on machine learning methods and metagenomic analysis, providing novel solutions across various domains. However, the restricted size of metagenomic datasets presents challenges for robust model training. Consequently, data augmentation techniques, such as Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGAN), have obtained attention. This study seeks to utilize machine learning algorithms, incorporating CTGAN, to assess the influence of microbial community composition on the growth patterns of Clostridium bacteria in metagenomic dataset. Additionally, the study employs SHAP analysis to explain feature importance and contrast model performance pre- and post-data augmentation. The findings demonstrate notable enhancements in classification metrics subsequent to data augmentation, particularly evident when excluding the “Day” feature. Moreover, SHAP analysis identifies pivotal features, notably the absence of the “Day” variable post-CTGAN synthesis, emphasizing the significance of specific bacterial genera like Clostridium in bacterial growth dynamics. Overall, this study underscores the efficacy of data augmentation techniques, specifically CTGAN, in enhancing machine learning model performance for metagenomic data classification tasks, with implications for refining food safety and healthcare protocols. Further research could explore advanced data augmentation methodologies and validate outcomes on more expansive datasets for practical implementation.
Authors
- Mohamed Bader–El–Den (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1123-6823)
- Omer Faruk Sari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5777-9763)
- Volkan Ince (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1729-205X)
Institutions
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-08-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/is61756.2024.10705275
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Gene expression and cancer classification
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.64