Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Enhanced Predictive Modeling in Healthcare

Recently, there has been a surge in predictive modeling in healthcare because it can save lives through early diagnostics and treatments. Advances in algorithms and computing power can be harnessed to develop predictive models using Python-based programs and automated ML platforms. This study compares the performance of neural networks and automated ML models in predicting coronary heart disease using data from the UCI repository. We utilized Python-based neural networks and IBM Watson's Snap Logistic Regression, Extra Trees Classifier, and Logistic Regression. Our results show that IBM Watson's models achieved an accuracy of 86%, outperforming the neural network's 80%. This comparative analysis highlights the potential of automated ML platforms in enhancing predictive modeling in healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/is61756.2024.10705168
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Enhanced Predictive Modeling in Healthcare

Sohail Zaidi, Advika Arya, Farwa Kazmi
2 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
1.42
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Enhanced Predictive Modeling in Healthcare

Sohail Zaidi, Advika Arya, Farwa Kazmi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recently, there has been a surge in predictive modeling in healthcare because it can save lives through early diagnostics and treatments. Advances in algorithms and computing power can be harnessed to develop predictive models using Python-based programs and automated ML platforms. This study compares the performance of neural networks and automated ML models in predicting coronary heart disease using data from the UCI repository. We utilized Python-based neural networks and IBM Watson's Snap Logistic Regression, Extra Trees Classifier, and Logistic Regression. Our results show that IBM Watson's models achieved an accuracy of 86%, outperforming the neural network's 80%. This comparative analysis highlights the potential of automated ML platforms in enhancing predictive modeling in healthcare.

Intel (United States) (US), San Jose State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.