Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Reference Systems for DC Power Quality Measurements

Low-voltage DC microgrids are a popular solution for a direct integration of more and more renewable energy sources. In this scenario, it is reasonable to expect that the power signal will not consist of pure DC components but will be affected by disturbances and power quality (PQ) events coming from the AC bulk grid as well as from switching power supplies or time-varying loads. To the state of the art, the normative framework does not provide a rigorous approach towards DCPQ analysis. We lack a clear and unambiguous definition of some quantities (e.g., DC power) or measurement methods (e.g., DC ripple). In order to solve this problem, the recent project DC grids has developed two reference systems for DCPQ at METAS and VSL laboratories. In this paper, we compare the systems' performance by means of a measurement campaign on the same transfer standard. The results confirm the consistency of the two reference systems and provide some insightful inputs for the standardization of these tests in the normative framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/amps62611.2024.10706676
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Power Quality and Harmonics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Reference Systems for DC Power Quality Measurements

Guglielmo Frigo, Helko E. van den Brom, Antonio Delle Femine, Ronald van Leeuwen et al.
2 citations
Power Quality and Harmonics
0.42
article

Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Reference Systems for DC Power Quality Measurements

Guglielmo Frigo, Helko E. van den Brom, Antonio Delle Femine, Ronald van Leeuwen, Domenico Giordano, Davide Signorino, Daniele Gallo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Low-voltage DC microgrids are a popular solution for a direct integration of more and more renewable energy sources. In this scenario, it is reasonable to expect that the power signal will not consist of pure DC components but will be affected by disturbances and power quality (PQ) events coming from the AC bulk grid as well as from switching power supplies or time-varying loads. To the state of the art, the normative framework does not provide a rigorous approach towards DCPQ analysis. We lack a clear and unambiguous definition of some quantities (e.g., DC power) or measurement methods (e.g., DC ripple). In order to solve this problem, the recent project DC grids has developed two reference systems for DCPQ at METAS and VSL laboratories. In this paper, we compare the systems' performance by means of a measurement campaign on the same transfer standard. The results confirm the consistency of the two reference systems and provide some insightful inputs for the standardization of these tests in the normative framework.

University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology (CH), Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT), VSL National Metrology Institute (NL)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Power Quality and Harmonics
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.