Development and validation of predictive models for mortality of cases with COVID-19 (Omicron BA.5.2.48 and B.7.14): a retrospective study

Our study developed and validated three practical models for predicting mortality in patients with new COVID-19 variants. All models performed well, and XGBoost was the best-performing model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082616
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of predictive models for mortality of cases with COVID-19 (Omicron BA.5.2.48 and B.7.14): a retrospective study

Ailin Hou, Peifang Li, Huiliang Yang, Jiali Chen et al.
BMJ Open
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
article

Development and validation of predictive models for mortality of cases with COVID-19 (Omicron BA.5.2.48 and B.7.14): a retrospective study

Ailin Hou, Peifang Li, Huiliang Yang, Jiali Chen, Ning Ning, Yanfei Ma, Jinyu Wu
article en

Abstract

Our study developed and validated three practical models for predicting mortality in patients with new COVID-19 variants. All models performed well, and XGBoost was the best-performing model.

BMJ OpenVol. 14(10)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.