The Unfree Commons: Freedom of Marine Scientific Research and the Status of Genetic Resources Beyond National Jurisdiction

Longstanding negotiations on the status of marine genetic resources beyond national jurisdiction under a new UN treaty oscillated between the common heritage of mankind and the freedom of the high seas. The final text of the new Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Treaty bridges the normative dissonance by crafting a freedom of marine scientific research juxtaposed with the common heritage of humankind. This article argues that the principle is a specific carve‐out from the freedom of scientific research in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), enumerated as one of the freedoms of the high seas. The principle of freedom of marine scientific research is best conceived as a property‐protected activity tethered to marine genetic resources where the scope and consequences of the activity demarcate the commons resource. It derives legitimacy and content from the common heritage regimes in UNCLOS as well as the operative elements of Part II of the BBNJ Treaty that address the equitable use of marine genetic resources and digital sequence information on marine genetic resources. As such, this element in the Treaty and the explanation set out here introduces a new and unprecedented constitutionalising norm in global biodiversity governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Law Review
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12923
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Unfree Commons: Freedom of Marine Scientific Research and the Status of Genetic Resources Beyond National Jurisdiction

Siva Thambisetty
2 citations
Modern Law Review
International Maritime Law Issues
1.42
article

The Unfree Commons: Freedom of Marine Scientific Research and the Status of Genetic Resources Beyond National Jurisdiction

Siva Thambisetty
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Longstanding negotiations on the status of marine genetic resources beyond national jurisdiction under a new UN treaty oscillated between the common heritage of mankind and the freedom of the high seas. The final text of the new Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Treaty bridges the normative dissonance by crafting a freedom of marine scientific research juxtaposed with the common heritage of humankind. This article argues that the principle is a specific carve‐out from the freedom of scientific research in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), enumerated as one of the freedoms of the high seas. The principle of freedom of marine scientific research is best conceived as a property‐protected activity tethered to marine genetic resources where the scope and consequences of the activity demarcate the commons resource. It derives legitimacy and content from the common heritage regimes in UNCLOS as well as the operative elements of Part II of the BBNJ Treaty that address the equitable use of marine genetic resources and digital sequence information on marine genetic resources. As such, this element in the Treaty and the explanation set out here introduces a new and unprecedented constitutionalising norm in global biodiversity governance.

Modern Law ReviewVol. 88(2)
Information Today (United States) (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
International Maritime Law Issues
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.