Best descriptors for predicting noise annoyance and spectrum-based penalty of steady-state wideband noise

Many objective descriptors (i.e., single-number quantities) are available in the literature for the objective assessment of noise annoyance of wideband, steady-state sounds. However, there is no definitive understanding of which descriptors best correspond to subjective annoyance. Our purpose is to assess how different descriptors correspond with differences in noise annoyance resulting from changes in A-weighted sound level and spectrum. This investigation is based on recently published results from a psychoacoustic experiment conducted by Kuusinen et al. [1]. They investigated 23 steady-state wideband noises with various spectral shapes within 32-48 dB LAeq, and participants rated them in terms of subjective annoyance. The study revealed that penalty due to spectrum shape could be even 10 dB. Here, we present a follow up analysis focusing on objective noise descriptors. The results indicate that many descriptors are strongly associated with noise annoyance ratings, while Spectral Centroid and Sharpness appear to be the best candidates to predict spectrum-based penalty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NOISE-CON proceedings
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3397/in_2024_3306
Primary Topic
Speech and Audio Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best descriptors for predicting noise annoyance and spectrum-based penalty of steady-state wideband noise

Antti Kuusinen, Valtteri Hongisto
NOISE-CON proceedings
Speech and Audio Processing
article

Best descriptors for predicting noise annoyance and spectrum-based penalty of steady-state wideband noise

Antti Kuusinen, Valtteri Hongisto
article en

Abstract

Many objective descriptors (i.e., single-number quantities) are available in the literature for the objective assessment of noise annoyance of wideband, steady-state sounds. However, there is no definitive understanding of which descriptors best correspond to subjective annoyance. Our purpose is to assess how different descriptors correspond with differences in noise annoyance resulting from changes in A-weighted sound level and spectrum. This investigation is based on recently published results from a psychoacoustic experiment conducted by Kuusinen et al. [1]. They investigated 23 steady-state wideband noises with various spectral shapes within 32-48 dB LAeq, and participants rated them in terms of subjective annoyance. The study revealed that penalty due to spectrum shape could be even 10 dB. Here, we present a follow up analysis focusing on objective noise descriptors. The results indicate that many descriptors are strongly associated with noise annoyance ratings, while Spectral Centroid and Sharpness appear to be the best candidates to predict spectrum-based penalty.

NOISE-CON proceedingsVol. 270(8)
Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Speech and Audio Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.