Experimental study of shooting sound around semi-open shooting ranges

Measurements of shooting sound around semi-open shooting ranges are analyzed. Recorded sound signals show bullet sound and muzzle sound contributions. Time differences between bullet and muzzle sound pulses are explained by calculation of acoustical travel times. In general bullet sound contributions are stronger in forward directions (angles 0 to 90 degrees with respect to the shooting direction) than in backward directions. A representative frequency is defined to characterize the relative importance of bullet sound in the emitted sound spectrum. This is further analyzed by means of silencers on the firearms, as silencers suppress the muzzle sound but not the bullet sound. The effect of acoustical absorption material on the shooting range is also investigated. Differences of the order of 10 dB between different shooting ranges are attributed to acoustical absorption material of the overhead screens (baffles) on the range. For practical applications it would be useful to represent a shooting range by a single point source with a direction-dependent sound emission spectrum. The accuracy of this approximation is investigated.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NOISE-CON proceedings
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3397/in_2024_3557
Primary Topic
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study of shooting sound around semi-open shooting ranges

Didi van Dijk, A.R. Eisses, Erik M. Salomons
NOISE-CON proceedings
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
article

Experimental study of shooting sound around semi-open shooting ranges

Didi van Dijk, A.R. Eisses, Erik M. Salomons
article en

Abstract

Measurements of shooting sound around semi-open shooting ranges are analyzed. Recorded sound signals show bullet sound and muzzle sound contributions. Time differences between bullet and muzzle sound pulses are explained by calculation of acoustical travel times. In general bullet sound contributions are stronger in forward directions (angles 0 to 90 degrees with respect to the shooting direction) than in backward directions. A representative frequency is defined to characterize the relative importance of bullet sound in the emitted sound spectrum. This is further analyzed by means of silencers on the firearms, as silencers suppress the muzzle sound but not the bullet sound. The effect of acoustical absorption material on the shooting range is also investigated. Differences of the order of 10 dB between different shooting ranges are attributed to acoustical absorption material of the overhead screens (baffles) on the range. For practical applications it would be useful to represent a shooting range by a single point source with a direction-dependent sound emission spectrum. The accuracy of this approximation is investigated.

NOISE-CON proceedingsVol. 270(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.