Automatic Treatment Planning for Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Modality and Protocol Study
Our findings show that a model trained only on IMRT plans can effectively contribute to planning across various modalities. Additionally, integrating predictions as constraints in an MCO-based workflow, rather than direct dose mimicking, enables a flexible, warm-start approach for treatment planning, although the benefit is reduced when the training set differs significantly from an institution's preference. Together, these approaches have the potential to significantly decrease plan turnaround time and quality variance, both at high-resource medical centers that can train in-house models and smaller centers that can adapt a model from another institution with minimal effort.
Authors
- Pew‐Thian Yap (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1489-2102)
- Gregory Szalkowski (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-232X)
- Jun Lian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-9074)
- Xuanang Xu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-8457)
- Shiva K. Das
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Imaging Center (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Advances in Radiation Oncology
- Published
- 2024-10-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101649
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.82
Funders
- National Institutes of Health