Automatic Treatment Planning for Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Modality and Protocol Study

Our findings show that a model trained only on IMRT plans can effectively contribute to planning across various modalities. Additionally, integrating predictions as constraints in an MCO-based workflow, rather than direct dose mimicking, enables a flexible, warm-start approach for treatment planning, although the benefit is reduced when the training set differs significantly from an institution's preference. Together, these approaches have the potential to significantly decrease plan turnaround time and quality variance, both at high-resource medical centers that can train in-house models and smaller centers that can adapt a model from another institution with minimal effort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2024.101649
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic Treatment Planning for Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Modality and Protocol Study

Pew‐Thian Yap, Gregory Szalkowski, Jun Lian, Xuanang Xu et al.
3 citations
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.82
article

Automatic Treatment Planning for Radiation Therapy: A Cross-Modality and Protocol Study

Pew‐Thian Yap, Gregory Szalkowski, Jun Lian, Xuanang Xu, Shiva K. Das
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Our findings show that a model trained only on IMRT plans can effectively contribute to planning across various modalities. Additionally, integrating predictions as constraints in an MCO-based workflow, rather than direct dose mimicking, enables a flexible, warm-start approach for treatment planning, although the benefit is reduced when the training set differs significantly from an institution's preference. Together, these approaches have the potential to significantly decrease plan turnaround time and quality variance, both at high-resource medical centers that can train in-house models and smaller centers that can adapt a model from another institution with minimal effort.

Advances in Radiation OncologyVol. 9(12)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Imaging Center (US), Stanford University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
1.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.