Thinking or feeling? The effect of information diversity on consumption decisions based on the social support framework

Purpose Instrumental and emotional information influence paradoxically on people’s decision-making, and similar influences are more evident in e-commerce scenarios where physical information is limited. This study aims to construct a systematic explanatory framework for the influence of multidimensional recommendation information diversity (RID) on users' click and purchase decisions based on the social support theory (SST). Design/methodology/approach This study analyses 453,176 data from 67,079 users of a Chinese e-commerce platform, applying lasso algorithmic techniques and cross-fit partialling-out (XPO) regression for empirical analysis. Findings The study finds that instrumental support information diversity (ISID) and emotional support information diversity (ESID) play divergent roles, and that the effects of both on user decision-making are inconsistent with mode-flip and marginal change. Differences in users' information craving and information overload processing mechanisms for instrumental and emotional information, leading to an inverted U-shaped effect of ISID on consumption decisions, while ESID has a U-shaped effect. Additionally, supplier certification eliminates the marginal change in ESID, and products with a high information standardisation degree eliminate the marginal change in ISID. Originality/value Research results reveal the opposing roles of the two types of RID and the application boundaries of their roles, providing empirical evidence for academic research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-04-2024-0287
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking or feeling? The effect of information diversity on consumption decisions based on the social support framework

Xiaosong Dong, W Li
1 citations
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Media Influence and Politics
1.13
article

Thinking or feeling? The effect of information diversity on consumption decisions based on the social support framework

Xiaosong Dong, W Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Instrumental and emotional information influence paradoxically on people’s decision-making, and similar influences are more evident in e-commerce scenarios where physical information is limited. This study aims to construct a systematic explanatory framework for the influence of multidimensional recommendation information diversity (RID) on users' click and purchase decisions based on the social support theory (SST). Design/methodology/approach This study analyses 453,176 data from 67,079 users of a Chinese e-commerce platform, applying lasso algorithmic techniques and cross-fit partialling-out (XPO) regression for empirical analysis. Findings The study finds that instrumental support information diversity (ISID) and emotional support information diversity (ESID) play divergent roles, and that the effects of both on user decision-making are inconsistent with mode-flip and marginal change. Differences in users' information craving and information overload processing mechanisms for instrumental and emotional information, leading to an inverted U-shaped effect of ISID on consumption decisions, while ESID has a U-shaped effect. Additionally, supplier certification eliminates the marginal change in ESID, and products with a high information standardisation degree eliminate the marginal change in ISID. Originality/value Research results reveal the opposing roles of the two types of RID and the application boundaries of their roles, providing empirical evidence for academic research.

Aslib Journal of Information ManagementVol. 78(2)
Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Media Influence and Politics
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.