Comparing low frequency impact insulation measured with the rubber ball versus the tapping machine

The heavy/soft impact source or rubber ball, defined in ISO 10140 and 16283, is used primarily in Japan and Korea to evaluate low-frequency impact insulation from sources such as walking without shoes and children jumping. ASTM test methods currently do not include the heavy/soft source, and low frequency impact noise insulation is currently measured with the tapping machine using ratings such as LIR and LIIC per ASTM E3207. ISO ratings using spectrum adaptation terms from 50 Hz or lower can also be used. The relationship between these ratings and those measured using the heavy/soft source has not been well characterized for assemblies that are common in North America. The authors present field and laboratory data of impact insulation with both sources. Analysis of the data describes the relationship between the sources, the information they provide to the designers of floor assemblies, and implications for classifications of low frequency impact insulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
NOISE-CON proceedings
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3397/in_2024_4188
Primary Topic
High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing low frequency impact insulation measured with the rubber ball versus the tapping machine

Wayland Dong, John LoVerde
NOISE-CON proceedings
High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
article

Comparing low frequency impact insulation measured with the rubber ball versus the tapping machine

Wayland Dong, John LoVerde
article en

Abstract

The heavy/soft impact source or rubber ball, defined in ISO 10140 and 16283, is used primarily in Japan and Korea to evaluate low-frequency impact insulation from sources such as walking without shoes and children jumping. ASTM test methods currently do not include the heavy/soft source, and low frequency impact noise insulation is currently measured with the tapping machine using ratings such as LIR and LIIC per ASTM E3207. ISO ratings using spectrum adaptation terms from 50 Hz or lower can also be used. The relationship between these ratings and those measured using the heavy/soft source has not been well characterized for assemblies that are common in North America. The authors present field and laboratory data of impact insulation with both sources. Analysis of the data describes the relationship between the sources, the information they provide to the designers of floor assemblies, and implications for classifications of low frequency impact insulation.

NOISE-CON proceedingsVol. 270(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing low frequency impact insulation measured with the rubber ball versus the tapping machine — Wayland Dong, John LoVerde · NOISE-CON proceedings (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS