Improving Equatorial Upper Ocean Vertical Mixing in the NOAA/GFDL OM4 Model

Abstract Deficiencies in upper ocean vertical mixing parameterizations contribute to tropical upper ocean biases in global coupled general circulation models, affecting their simulated ocean heat uptake and ENSO variability. To better understand these deficiencies, we develop a suite of ocean model experiments including both idealized single column models and realistic global simulations. The vertical mixing parameterizations are first evaluated using large eddy simulations as a baseline to assess uncertainties and evaluate their implied turbulent mixing. Global models are then developed following NOAA/GFDL's 0.25° nominal horizontal grid spacing OM4 (uncoupled) configuration of the MOM6 ocean model, with various modifications that target biases in the original model. We test several enhancements to the existing mixing schemes and evaluate them against observational constraints from Tropical Atmosphere Ocean moorings and Argo floats. In particular, we find that we can improve the diurnal variability of mixing in OM4 via modifications to its surface boundary layer mixing scheme, and can improve the net mixing in the upper thermocline by reducing the background vertical viscosity, allowing for more realistic, less diffuse currents. The improved OM4 model better represents the mixing, leading to improved diurnal deep‐cycle variability, a more realistic time‐mean tropical thermocline structure, and a better Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Space Science
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023ea003485
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Equatorial Upper Ocean Vertical Mixing in the NOAA/GFDL OM4 Model

Brandon G. Reichl, Alistair Adcroft, Andrew T. Wittenberg, Stephen M. Griffies
6 citations
Earth and Space Science
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
2.88
article

Improving Equatorial Upper Ocean Vertical Mixing in the NOAA/GFDL OM4 Model

Brandon G. Reichl, Alistair Adcroft, Andrew T. Wittenberg, Stephen M. Griffies
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Deficiencies in upper ocean vertical mixing parameterizations contribute to tropical upper ocean biases in global coupled general circulation models, affecting their simulated ocean heat uptake and ENSO variability. To better understand these deficiencies, we develop a suite of ocean model experiments including both idealized single column models and realistic global simulations. The vertical mixing parameterizations are first evaluated using large eddy simulations as a baseline to assess uncertainties and evaluate their implied turbulent mixing. Global models are then developed following NOAA/GFDL's 0.25° nominal horizontal grid spacing OM4 (uncoupled) configuration of the MOM6 ocean model, with various modifications that target biases in the original model. We test several enhancements to the existing mixing schemes and evaluate them against observational constraints from Tropical Atmosphere Ocean moorings and Argo floats. In particular, we find that we can improve the diurnal variability of mixing in OM4 via modifications to its surface boundary layer mixing scheme, and can improve the net mixing in the upper thermocline by reducing the background vertical viscosity, allowing for more realistic, less diffuse currents. The improved OM4 model better represents the mixing, leading to improved diurnal deep‐cycle variability, a more realistic time‐mean tropical thermocline structure, and a better Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent.

Earth and Space ScienceVol. 11(10)
NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Climate Program Office, NOAA Research
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
2.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.