Differences in cellular and molecular processes in exposure to PM2.5 and O3

Epidemiological and toxicological studies have shown that PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> could pose significant risks to human health, such as an increased incidence of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Usually, the adverse health outcomes induced by PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure are similar. However, PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> have distinct physical and chemical properties, with PM<sub>2.5</sub> being a solid-liquid mixture and O<sub>3</sub> being a strongly oxidizing gaseous pollutant. Therefore, we speculated that there are some differences in biological processes induced by PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure. In the present study, we investigated the differences induced by PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure from the perspective of cellular and molecular processes. Firstly, the pulmonary epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) were exposed to different concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> or O<sub>3</sub> at different durations. Then, we chose experimental models with the concentrations and duration at which the cell survival rate was 50 % after exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>, which were 100 μg/mL for 24 h for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and 200 ppb for 4 h for O<sub>3</sub>. Our findings indicate that PM<sub>2.5</sub> infiltrates cells via endocytosis without causing significant damage to cell membranes, while O<sub>3</sub> induces lipid peroxidation at the cell surface. Moreover, the detection of mitochondrial function showed that the content of ATP was significantly reduced after exposure to both PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>. However, we found a significant difference in mtDNA copy number. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure increased the mtDNA copy number by up-regulating the expression of fission genes (Fis1, Mff, Dnm1). O<sub>3</sub> exposure decreased it by up-regulating the expression of fusion gene (Mfn1, Mfn2) and down-regulating the expression of fission gene (Fis1, Dnm1). These results indicate that although both PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure induced almost exactly similar adverse health outcomes, significant differences do exist in cellular and molecular processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.109052
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in cellular and molecular processes in exposure to PM2.5 and O3

Yongjie Wei, Zhigang Li, Rongrong Xu, Tingting Wu et al.
9 citations
Environment International
Air Quality and Health Impacts
2.83
article

Differences in cellular and molecular processes in exposure to PM2.5 and O3

Yongjie Wei, Zhigang Li, Rongrong Xu, Tingting Wu, Hao Liu
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Epidemiological and toxicological studies have shown that PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> could pose significant risks to human health, such as an increased incidence of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Usually, the adverse health outcomes induced by PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure are similar. However, PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> have distinct physical and chemical properties, with PM<sub>2.5</sub> being a solid-liquid mixture and O<sub>3</sub> being a strongly oxidizing gaseous pollutant. Therefore, we speculated that there are some differences in biological processes induced by PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure. In the present study, we investigated the differences induced by PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure from the perspective of cellular and molecular processes. Firstly, the pulmonary epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) were exposed to different concentrations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> or O<sub>3</sub> at different durations. Then, we chose experimental models with the concentrations and duration at which the cell survival rate was 50 % after exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>, which were 100 μg/mL for 24 h for PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and 200 ppb for 4 h for O<sub>3</sub>. Our findings indicate that PM<sub>2.5</sub> infiltrates cells via endocytosis without causing significant damage to cell membranes, while O<sub>3</sub> induces lipid peroxidation at the cell surface. Moreover, the detection of mitochondrial function showed that the content of ATP was significantly reduced after exposure to both PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>. However, we found a significant difference in mtDNA copy number. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure increased the mtDNA copy number by up-regulating the expression of fission genes (Fis1, Mff, Dnm1). O<sub>3</sub> exposure decreased it by up-regulating the expression of fusion gene (Mfn1, Mfn2) and down-regulating the expression of fission gene (Fis1, Dnm1). These results indicate that although both PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> exposure induced almost exactly similar adverse health outcomes, significant differences do exist in cellular and molecular processes.

Environment InternationalVol. 192
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN)
Key Technologies Research and Development Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
2.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.