Association Between Sex and Race and Ethnicity and IV Sedation Use in Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation

BACKGROUND: IV sedation is an important tool for managing patients receiving invasive ventilation, yet excess sedation is harmful, and dosing could be influenced by implicit bias.RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the associations between sex or race and ethnicity and sedation practices?STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults receiving invasive ventilation for $ 24 hours using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Version IV (2008-2019) database from Boston, Massachusetts.We used a repeated-measures design (4-hour intervals) to study the association between sex (female or male) or race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White) and sedation outcomes.Sedation outcomes included sedative use (propofol, benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine) and minimum sedation score.We categorized sedative use as follows: no sedative and then lowest, second, third, and highest quartiles of sedative dose.We adjusted for covariates with multilevel Bayesian proportional odds modeling and reported ORs with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). RESULTS:We studied 6,764 patients: 43% female; 3.5% Asian, 12% Black, 4.5% Hispanic, and 80% White.Benzodiazepines were administered to 2,334 patients (36%).Black patients received benzodiazepines less often and at lower doses than White patients (more benzodiazepine: OR, 0.66; 95% CrI, 0.49-0.92).Propofol was administered to 3,865 patients (57%).Female patients received propofol less often and at lower doses than male patients (more propofol: OR, 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.61-0.86).Dexmedetomidine was administered to 1,439 patients (21%), and use was similar across sex or race and ethnicity.Female patients were less sedated than male patients (deeper sedation: OR, 0.71; 95% CrI, 0.62-0.81),and Black patients were more sedated than White patients (more sedated: OR, 1.28; 95% CrI, 1.05-1.55).INTERPRETATION: Among patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least 24 hours, IV sedation and attained sedation levels varied by sex and by race and ethnicity.Adherence to sedation guidelines may improve equity in sedation management for critically ill patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CHEST Critical Care
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100100
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association Between Sex and Race and Ethnicity and IV Sedation Use in Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation

Alistair E. W. Johnson, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, S. Walker, Christopher J. Yarnell et al.
6 citations
CHEST Critical Care
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
2.70
article

Association Between Sex and Race and Ethnicity and IV Sedation Use in Patients Receiving Invasive Ventilation

Alistair E. W. Johnson, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, S. Walker, Christopher J. Yarnell, Leo Anthony Celi, Federico Angriman, Kirsten Marie Fiest, George Tomlinson, Elizabeth L. Whitlock, Lisa D. Burry, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Georgiana Roman-Sarita, Kuan Liu, Thanh-Giang T. Vu, Sangeeta Mehta
article en
6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: IV sedation is an important tool for managing patients receiving invasive ventilation, yet excess sedation is harmful, and dosing could be influenced by implicit bias.RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the associations between sex or race and ethnicity and sedation practices?STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study of adults receiving invasive ventilation for $ 24 hours using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Version IV (2008-2019) database from Boston, Massachusetts.We used a repeated-measures design (4-hour intervals) to study the association between sex (female or male) or race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White) and sedation outcomes.Sedation outcomes included sedative use (propofol, benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine) and minimum sedation score.We categorized sedative use as follows: no sedative and then lowest, second, third, and highest quartiles of sedative dose.We adjusted for covariates with multilevel Bayesian proportional odds modeling and reported ORs with 95% credible intervals (CrIs). RESULTS:We studied 6,764 patients: 43% female; 3.5% Asian, 12% Black, 4.5% Hispanic, and 80% White.Benzodiazepines were administered to 2,334 patients (36%).Black patients received benzodiazepines less often and at lower doses than White patients (more benzodiazepine: OR, 0.66; 95% CrI, 0.49-0.92).Propofol was administered to 3,865 patients (57%).Female patients received propofol less often and at lower doses than male patients (more propofol: OR, 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.61-0.86).Dexmedetomidine was administered to 1,439 patients (21%), and use was similar across sex or race and ethnicity.Female patients were less sedated than male patients (deeper sedation: OR, 0.71; 95% CrI, 0.62-0.81),and Black patients were more sedated than White patients (more sedated: OR, 1.28; 95% CrI, 1.05-1.55).INTERPRETATION: Among patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least 24 hours, IV sedation and attained sedation levels varied by sex and by race and ethnicity.Adherence to sedation guidelines may improve equity in sedation management for critically ill patients.

CHEST Critical CareVol. 2(4)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), University Health Network (CA), Emory University (US), University of Calgary (CA), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA), University of Washington (US), Scarborough Health Network (CA), Vector Institute (CA), Sinai Health System (CA)
Emory University, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, York University, University of Toronto, University of California, San Francisco, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.