The Validity and Usability of Markerless Motion Capture and Inertial Measurement Units for Quantifying Dynamic Movements
Markerless motion capture and IMUs have moderate validity for joint kinematics, whereas the RGBD system did not have adequate validity. Markerless systems have lower data processing time, require moderate technical expertise, but have high data storage size. IMUs are easier to use, can collect data in any location, but require participant set-up. Overall, individuals using motion capture should consider the specific movements, testing locations, and technical expertise available before selecting a system.
Authors
- Nathan A. Edwards
- James A. Oñate (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1563-6661)
- Ryan Tracy
- Jaclyn B. Caccese (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-3603)
- Joshua A. Hagen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-1191)
- Catherine Quatman‐Yates (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-6062)
Institutions
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2024-10-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003579
- Citations
- 8
- Primary Topic
- Shoulder Injury and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.58