Acoustic conditions in innovative learning environments

New generation or innovative learning environments are being developed in many OECD coun-tries, including Australia and New Zealand. These spaces are often criticized as being 'noisy', dis-tracting, unattenable, and yet, there has been a link between deep learning outcomes and the new generation environments. Education spaces primarily revolve around speaking and listening activities. Although new space typologies have been, and continue to be, developed, the acoustic standards applied to them are often the same as those applied to traditional cellular classroom spaces. This paper presents the results of systematic acoustic testing undertaken within numerous physical spaces for traditional and new generation learning environments in Australia and New Zealand, to compare the differences in performance between traditional cellular classrooms and open plan spaces, and summarise any trends evident in the information. It also acknowledges the differences between traditional cellular spaces and new generation environments as determined from the results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NOISE-CON proceedings
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3397/in_2024_2726
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acoustic conditions in innovative learning environments

Amanda ROBINSON
1 links
NOISE-CON proceedings
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
article

Acoustic conditions in innovative learning environments

Amanda ROBINSON
article en

Abstract

New generation or innovative learning environments are being developed in many OECD coun-tries, including Australia and New Zealand. These spaces are often criticized as being 'noisy', dis-tracting, unattenable, and yet, there has been a link between deep learning outcomes and the new generation environments. Education spaces primarily revolve around speaking and listening activities. Although new space typologies have been, and continue to be, developed, the acoustic standards applied to them are often the same as those applied to traditional cellular classroom spaces. This paper presents the results of systematic acoustic testing undertaken within numerous physical spaces for traditional and new generation learning environments in Australia and New Zealand, to compare the differences in performance between traditional cellular classrooms and open plan spaces, and summarise any trends evident in the information. It also acknowledges the differences between traditional cellular spaces and new generation environments as determined from the results.

NOISE-CON proceedingsVol. 270(11)
Interacoustics (Denmark) (DK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acoustic conditions in innovative learning environments — Amanda ROBINSON · NOISE-CON proceedings (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS