Redesigning an AI bill of rights with/for young people: Principles for exploring AI ethics with middle and high school students

“AI ethics” has become a popular term for signaling concerns with the development and application of artificial intelligence, and a hot-button issue in both academic and public discourse. The current work tends to center adult-oriented, adult-generated, issues-based conceptions of ethics. This paper reports on an alternative model for “doing ethics” via co-design with young people, highlighting the need for students to engage in AI ethics work, especially as AI is increasingly used in their education and social lives. In particular, we focus on developing a rights-based approach, using the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights as a starting point for redesigning core AI ethics principles and their conveyance to be accessible and relevant to young people, in collaboration with young people. In this manuscript, we describe our empirical work in a series of three studies on AI ethics teaching and learning with middle and high school students, which culminated in redesigning pieces of the AI Bill of Rights. We present lessons learned, implications for responsible AI in education from student perspectives, and conclude with our suggested principles for integrating student insight and perspectives into the ethics frameworks that guide AI applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100317
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redesigning an AI bill of rights with/for young people: Principles for exploring AI ethics with middle and high school students

Ana Villanueva, Kendra H. Oliver, Angela Eeds, Zachary Conley et al.
8 citations
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.21
article

Redesigning an AI bill of rights with/for young people: Principles for exploring AI ethics with middle and high school students

Ana Villanueva, Kendra H. Oliver, Angela Eeds, Zachary Conley, Nicole Hutchins, Menton M. Deweese, Hannah Ziegler, Sarah K. Burriss, Yelena Janumyan Doe
article en
8 citations

Abstract

“AI ethics” has become a popular term for signaling concerns with the development and application of artificial intelligence, and a hot-button issue in both academic and public discourse. The current work tends to center adult-oriented, adult-generated, issues-based conceptions of ethics. This paper reports on an alternative model for “doing ethics” via co-design with young people, highlighting the need for students to engage in AI ethics work, especially as AI is increasingly used in their education and social lives. In particular, we focus on developing a rights-based approach, using the White House Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights as a starting point for redesigning core AI ethics principles and their conveyance to be accessible and relevant to young people, in collaboration with young people. In this manuscript, we describe our empirical work in a series of three studies on AI ethics teaching and learning with middle and high school students, which culminated in redesigning pieces of the AI Bill of Rights. We present lessons learned, implications for responsible AI in education from student perspectives, and conclude with our suggested principles for integrating student insight and perspectives into the ethics frameworks that guide AI applications.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 7
Vanderbilt University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.