Cross-comparison of the optical and acoustical calibration methods for microphones based on microelectromechanical system technologies

Calibration methods and associated international standards in airborne acoustics have enabled national metrology institutes to establish and maintain a fully defined traceability chain for designated laboratories and end users of microphones. However, such microphones need to be reciprocal, of condenser type and of specific dimensions; this, in effect, does not allow for the calibration of alternative existing sensor technologies and creates a further obstacle for the calibration of emerging technologies. An example relates to microphones based on microelectromechanical systems which are an integral part of a wide range of electronic devices; yet, there is no established calibration traceability chain other than methods employed by manufacturers. From a metrological perspective, new calibration methods that can accommodate microphones regardless of their size, reciprocal nature and utilised technology must be developed and subsequently standardised and adopted. This paper discusses the optical calibration method based on free field photon correlation and the acoustical calibration methods based on pressure comparison and free field substitution. These approaches can provide traceability to the international measurement standard system for novel types of microphones, and the measurement results showed themselves to be consistent. Based on this study, the possibility of expanding the new standard system was investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NOISE-CON proceedings
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3397/in_2024_3677
Primary Topic
Flow Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-comparison of the optical and acoustical calibration methods for microphones based on microelectromechanical system technologies

Alessandro Schiavi, Fabio Saba, Giovanni Durando, Andrea Prato et al.
NOISE-CON proceedings
Flow Measurement and Analysis
article

Cross-comparison of the optical and acoustical calibration methods for microphones based on microelectromechanical system technologies

Alessandro Schiavi, Fabio Saba, Giovanni Durando, Andrea Prato, Triantafillos Koukoulas, Wan‐Ho Cho, Lixue WU, Davide Paesante
article en

Abstract

Calibration methods and associated international standards in airborne acoustics have enabled national metrology institutes to establish and maintain a fully defined traceability chain for designated laboratories and end users of microphones. However, such microphones need to be reciprocal, of condenser type and of specific dimensions; this, in effect, does not allow for the calibration of alternative existing sensor technologies and creates a further obstacle for the calibration of emerging technologies. An example relates to microphones based on microelectromechanical systems which are an integral part of a wide range of electronic devices; yet, there is no established calibration traceability chain other than methods employed by manufacturers. From a metrological perspective, new calibration methods that can accommodate microphones regardless of their size, reciprocal nature and utilised technology must be developed and subsequently standardised and adopted. This paper discusses the optical calibration method based on free field photon correlation and the acoustical calibration methods based on pressure comparison and free field substitution. These approaches can provide traceability to the international measurement standard system for novel types of microphones, and the measurement results showed themselves to be consistent. Based on this study, the possibility of expanding the new standard system was investigated.

NOISE-CON proceedingsVol. 270(5)
Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KR), Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica (IT), National Research Council Canada (CA)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Flow Measurement and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.