A Comparative Study of Two Allen-Cahn Models for Immiscible $N$-Phase Flows by Using a Consistent and Conservative Lattice Boltzmann Method

In this work, we conduct a detailed comparison between two second-order conservative Allen-Cahn (AC) models [Model A: Zheng et al., Phys. Rev. E 101, 0433202 (2020) and Model B: Mirjalili and Mani, J. Comput. Phys. 498, 112657 (2024)] for the immiscible $N$-phase flows. Mathematically, these two AC equations can be proved to be equivalent under some approximate conditions. However, the effects of these approximations are unclear from the theoretical point of view, and would be considered numerically. To this end, we propose a consistent and conservative lattice Boltzmann method for the AC models for $N$-phase flows, and present some numerical comparisons of accuracy and stability between these two AC models. The results show that both two AC models have good performances in accuracy, but the Model B is more stable for the realistic complex $N$-phase flows, although there is an adjustable parameter in the Model A.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Computational Physics
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4208/cicp.oa-2023-0228
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Two Allen-Cahn Models for Immiscible $N$-Phase Flows by Using a Consistent and Conservative Lattice Boltzmann Method

Zhenhua Chai null, Chengjie Zhan, Baochang Shi, Xi Liu
2 citations
Communications in Computational Physics
Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
0.75
article

A Comparative Study of Two Allen-Cahn Models for Immiscible $N$-Phase Flows by Using a Consistent and Conservative Lattice Boltzmann Method

Zhenhua Chai null, Chengjie Zhan, Baochang Shi, Xi Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In this work, we conduct a detailed comparison between two second-order conservative Allen-Cahn (AC) models [Model A: Zheng et al., Phys. Rev. E 101, 0433202 (2020) and Model B: Mirjalili and Mani, J. Comput. Phys. 498, 112657 (2024)] for the immiscible $N$-phase flows. Mathematically, these two AC equations can be proved to be equivalent under some approximate conditions. However, the effects of these approximations are unclear from the theoretical point of view, and would be considered numerically. To this end, we propose a consistent and conservative lattice Boltzmann method for the AC models for $N$-phase flows, and present some numerical comparisons of accuracy and stability between these two AC models. The results show that both two AC models have good performances in accuracy, but the Model B is more stable for the realistic complex $N$-phase flows, although there is an adjustable parameter in the Model A.

Communications in Computational PhysicsVol. 36(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.