Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce

During humanitarian crises, under-resourced and overstretched health systems may not be able to fully meet mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) needs of affected populations, including refugees, internally displaced persons and host communities. Health system governance is vital to humanitarian health response, but there has been little research on this, particularly for MHPSS. We present a case study of a national coordination mechanism (the MHPSS Taskforce) in Lebanon, a country which has experienced multiple crises and hosts over 2 million refugees. The aim was to explore the barriers and enablers facing the MHPSS Taskforce in responding to the needs of displaced and host populations in Lebanon. Interviews were conducted with 34 key stakeholders, including Taskforce members, representatives from non-governmental organisations, United Nations agencies, and government Ministries. Our findings show that the positioning of MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system acts as a barrier to mounting an effective response, with the MHPSS Taskforce sometimes siloed rather than integrated across clusters. Coordination within the Taskforce was reported to be effective in some respects, but limited by a lack of clarity about its decision-making processes, affiliation, mandate, and inclusion of regional perspectives and key groups such as mental health services users in Lebanon. While the technical capacity of the Taskforce is strong, limited funding and staffing were seen to impact its capacity to effectively oversee the MHPSS response in Lebanon. Key recommendations include: the need for stronger mechanisms and operating procedures for interagency and inter-sectoral collaboration on MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system; greater clarity on the role of the Taskforce and key Taskforce actors, streamlined reporting channels and greater inclusion of diverse perspectives, particularly mental health service users; and greater financial and human resources within coordination mechanisms to support the national MHPSS response in Lebanon. • Health system governance is vital to humanitarian MHPSS responses. • MHPSS positioning within the cluster system is a barrier to an effective response. • Taskforce coordination can be effective but faces challenges. • Taskforce technical capacity is strong, but funding and staffing limit capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Mental Health
Published
2024-10-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100354
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce

Michelle Lokot, Rabih El Chammay, Bayard Roberts, Joseph Elias et al.
1 citations
SSM - Mental Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
1.11
article

Barriers and enablers to a coordinated MHPSS response in Lebanon: A case study of the MHPSS Taskforce

Michelle Lokot, Rabih El Chammay, Bayard Roberts, Joseph Elias, Ibrahim R. Bou-Orm, Martin McKee, Rozane El Masri, Bassel Meksassi, Sandy Chaar, Felicity L. Brown, Thurayya Zreik, Rayane Ali, Michèle Kosremelli Asmar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

During humanitarian crises, under-resourced and overstretched health systems may not be able to fully meet mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) needs of affected populations, including refugees, internally displaced persons and host communities. Health system governance is vital to humanitarian health response, but there has been little research on this, particularly for MHPSS. We present a case study of a national coordination mechanism (the MHPSS Taskforce) in Lebanon, a country which has experienced multiple crises and hosts over 2 million refugees. The aim was to explore the barriers and enablers facing the MHPSS Taskforce in responding to the needs of displaced and host populations in Lebanon. Interviews were conducted with 34 key stakeholders, including Taskforce members, representatives from non-governmental organisations, United Nations agencies, and government Ministries. Our findings show that the positioning of MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system acts as a barrier to mounting an effective response, with the MHPSS Taskforce sometimes siloed rather than integrated across clusters. Coordination within the Taskforce was reported to be effective in some respects, but limited by a lack of clarity about its decision-making processes, affiliation, mandate, and inclusion of regional perspectives and key groups such as mental health services users in Lebanon. While the technical capacity of the Taskforce is strong, limited funding and staffing were seen to impact its capacity to effectively oversee the MHPSS response in Lebanon. Key recommendations include: the need for stronger mechanisms and operating procedures for interagency and inter-sectoral collaboration on MHPSS within the humanitarian cluster system; greater clarity on the role of the Taskforce and key Taskforce actors, streamlined reporting channels and greater inclusion of diverse perspectives, particularly mental health service users; and greater financial and human resources within coordination mechanisms to support the national MHPSS response in Lebanon. • Health system governance is vital to humanitarian MHPSS responses. • MHPSS positioning within the cluster system is a barrier to an effective response. • Taskforce coordination can be effective but faces challenges. • Taskforce technical capacity is strong, but funding and staffing limit capacity.

SSM - Mental HealthVol. 6
Saint Joseph University (LB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Ministry of Public Health (LB), War Child (NL)
UK Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Global Maternal and Child Health
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.