Beyond the ‘gender gap’ in agriculture: Africa's Green Revolution and gendered rural transformation in Rwanda

The African Green Revolution (AGR) aims to modernize, intensify, and commercialize agriculture through increasing technology adoption by smallholder farmers. AGR interventions also promote gender equality, aiming to close the ‘gender gap’ in agriculture by enhancing women's access to purchased inputs, technology, land, and finance. With an empirical focus on Rwanda, this article examines the gendered implications of the AGR. We critically reflect on the notion of gender gaps and the associated tendency of development research to treat gender as a variable, assessing outcomes for male-headed versus female-headed households in terms of their access to material assets. We argue that these assessments overlook (1) the differential impacts of AGR policies within households and (2) how agricultural modernization influences gendered access to material resources as well as immaterial responsibilities, norms, and identities. Our findings from a mixed-methods study with four Rwandan communities show how the AGR empowers men as ‘modern’ farmers while marginalizing women's agricultural spaces, labor, and crops. We argue that development research and practice should move beyond the narrow focus on gender gaps to additionally consider how technologies and policies are themselves gendered in ways that can constrict food security, entrench inequitable power dynamics, and further marginalize women. • Africa's Green Revolution (AGR) fosters technology-led agricultural intensification. • In Rwanda, the AGR intersects with gendered land use and livelihood practices. • Men's economic opportunities are enhanced while women's livelihoods are constrained. • A focus on ‘gender gaps’ neglects how technologies and policies are gendered. • Evaluations of the AGR should approach rural transformation as a gendered process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-10-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103444
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the ‘gender gap’ in agriculture: Africa's Green Revolution and gendered rural transformation in Rwanda

Nathan Clay, Kayla Yurco
5 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
6.71
article

Beyond the ‘gender gap’ in agriculture: Africa's Green Revolution and gendered rural transformation in Rwanda

Nathan Clay, Kayla Yurco
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The African Green Revolution (AGR) aims to modernize, intensify, and commercialize agriculture through increasing technology adoption by smallholder farmers. AGR interventions also promote gender equality, aiming to close the ‘gender gap’ in agriculture by enhancing women's access to purchased inputs, technology, land, and finance. With an empirical focus on Rwanda, this article examines the gendered implications of the AGR. We critically reflect on the notion of gender gaps and the associated tendency of development research to treat gender as a variable, assessing outcomes for male-headed versus female-headed households in terms of their access to material assets. We argue that these assessments overlook (1) the differential impacts of AGR policies within households and (2) how agricultural modernization influences gendered access to material resources as well as immaterial responsibilities, norms, and identities. Our findings from a mixed-methods study with four Rwandan communities show how the AGR empowers men as ‘modern’ farmers while marginalizing women's agricultural spaces, labor, and crops. We argue that development research and practice should move beyond the narrow focus on gender gaps to additionally consider how technologies and policies are themselves gendered in ways that can constrict food security, entrench inequitable power dynamics, and further marginalize women. • Africa's Green Revolution (AGR) fosters technology-led agricultural intensification. • In Rwanda, the AGR intersects with gendered land use and livelihood practices. • Men's economic opportunities are enhanced while women's livelihoods are constrained. • A focus on ‘gender gaps’ neglects how technologies and policies are gendered. • Evaluations of the AGR should approach rural transformation as a gendered process.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 112
James Madison University (US), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), Stockholm University (SE), University of Oxford (GB)
United States Agency for International Development, Wellcome Trust, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
6.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.