My body my choice: The hostile appropriation of feminist cultural memory in American anti-vaccine movements

This article discusses how the reproductive rights slogan 'my body my choice' - which functions as a carrier of feminist cultural memory - was weaponised when it gained traction in anti-vaccine movements that appropriated it. During the global Covid-19 pandemic, transnationally coordinated groups associated with the far right and characterised by nationalist and pro-life values started using the protest slogan to politicise their resistance to local lockdown restrictions and vaccine and mask mandates. The article shows that their use of the slogan was a hostile form of mnemonic appropriation and analyses the discursive mechanisms used to discredit the reproductive rights movement. It demonstrates that when slogans become carriers of cultural memory, they can be used in claim-making by movements on opposing sides of the political spectrum. It concludes that protest memories can be used politically both in the advancement of social movement causes as well as in the backlash against those causes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory Studies
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980241262391
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

My body my choice: The hostile appropriation of feminist cultural memory in American anti-vaccine movements

Tashina Blom
14 citations
Memory Studies
Gender, Security, and Conflict
13.02
article

My body my choice: The hostile appropriation of feminist cultural memory in American anti-vaccine movements

Tashina Blom
article en
14 citations

Abstract

This article discusses how the reproductive rights slogan 'my body my choice' - which functions as a carrier of feminist cultural memory - was weaponised when it gained traction in anti-vaccine movements that appropriated it. During the global Covid-19 pandemic, transnationally coordinated groups associated with the far right and characterised by nationalist and pro-life values started using the protest slogan to politicise their resistance to local lockdown restrictions and vaccine and mask mandates. The article shows that their use of the slogan was a hostile form of mnemonic appropriation and analyses the discursive mechanisms used to discredit the reproductive rights movement. It demonstrates that when slogans become carriers of cultural memory, they can be used in claim-making by movements on opposing sides of the political spectrum. It concludes that protest memories can be used politically both in the advancement of social movement causes as well as in the backlash against those causes.

Memory StudiesVol. 17(5)
Utrecht University (NL)
European Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
13.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.