Activist turns: The (in)compatibility of scholarship and transformative activism
Is memory studies experiencing an activist turn? What discourses and practices surround such a pronouncement, and what forms of forgetting might such an assertion usher in? This commentary explores recent claim-making around memory studies’ activist turn and seeks to understand its provocations and critiques. It anchors these discourses within a wider constellation of scholar-activism, paying particular attention to citational politics and memory, activist forms of knowledge making, resource distribution, and the politics and precarities of the contemporary university system.
Authors
- Red Chidgey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9921-1187)
Institutions
- King's College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Memory Studies
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980241263246
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.53
Funders
- Arts and Humanities Research Council