Specific aspects of bacteriophage regulation: international practices and future developments

INTRODUCTION . The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains of pathogens determines the need for fundamentally new antibacterial agents, including bacteriophage preparations. The consistent implementation of phage therapy is hindered by the lack of generally accepted standardised regulatory documents governing the legal and methodological aspects of the production and preclinical and clinical studies of bacteriophage preparations. AIM . This study aimed to analyse the international experience with the production and lifecycle management of bacteriophage preparations, as well as the main regulatory requirements for the control of their quality, safety, and efficacy. DISCUSSION. It is difficult to develop virulent bacteriophage preparations in accordance with the existing requirements for other medicinal products because of the biological characteristics of bacteriophages, the wide variety of bacteriophage strains, and the potential for rapid changes both in the bacteriophage population and in the pathogen population. Therefore, it is reasonable to develop streamlined marketing authorisation routes for phage therapies and methods for the assessment of their safety and efficacy. As part of these efforts, it is necessary to assess the adverse events specific to this group of medicinal products, such as the risks of lysogeny, resistance to bacteriophages, and antibiotic resistance gene transfer between bacterial strains. The pharmaceutical development of bacteriophage preparations can be based on several approaches. Many countries worldwide, including the United States, are implementing the concept of Quality by Design, considering approaches based on the Biological Master File, and conducting Expanded Access programmes. The Active Substance Master File procedure allows the submission of a separate document package covering only part of the registration dossier for regulatory approval. Expanded Access programmes provide individual patients with access to innovative medicinal products without approved treatment protocols. In the Russian Federation, the commercial production of bacteriophage medicinal products is conducted in accordance with the quality standards specified in the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation. CONCLUSIONS . There are fundamental differences in the approaches to phage therapy and its regulation around the world and in the Russian Federation. It is reasonable to supplement the current national guidelines for the safety and efficacy evaluation of bacteriophage preparations, in particular, to specify the requirements for conducting preclinical studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Products Prevention Diagnosis Treatment
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30895/2221-996x-2024-24-3-322-334
Primary Topic
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Specific aspects of bacteriophage regulation: international practices and future developments

R. L. Parfenyuk, Z. V. Durmanova, Д. С. Давыдов, A. A. Movsesyants et al.
Biological Products Prevention Diagnosis Treatment
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
article

Specific aspects of bacteriophage regulation: international practices and future developments

R. L. Parfenyuk, Z. V. Durmanova, Д. С. Давыдов, A. A. Movsesyants, Ruslan Evgenievich Kazakov
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION . The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains of pathogens determines the need for fundamentally new antibacterial agents, including bacteriophage preparations. The consistent implementation of phage therapy is hindered by the lack of generally accepted standardised regulatory documents governing the legal and methodological aspects of the production and preclinical and clinical studies of bacteriophage preparations. AIM . This study aimed to analyse the international experience with the production and lifecycle management of bacteriophage preparations, as well as the main regulatory requirements for the control of their quality, safety, and efficacy. DISCUSSION. It is difficult to develop virulent bacteriophage preparations in accordance with the existing requirements for other medicinal products because of the biological characteristics of bacteriophages, the wide variety of bacteriophage strains, and the potential for rapid changes both in the bacteriophage population and in the pathogen population. Therefore, it is reasonable to develop streamlined marketing authorisation routes for phage therapies and methods for the assessment of their safety and efficacy. As part of these efforts, it is necessary to assess the adverse events specific to this group of medicinal products, such as the risks of lysogeny, resistance to bacteriophages, and antibiotic resistance gene transfer between bacterial strains. The pharmaceutical development of bacteriophage preparations can be based on several approaches. Many countries worldwide, including the United States, are implementing the concept of Quality by Design, considering approaches based on the Biological Master File, and conducting Expanded Access programmes. The Active Substance Master File procedure allows the submission of a separate document package covering only part of the registration dossier for regulatory approval. Expanded Access programmes provide individual patients with access to innovative medicinal products without approved treatment protocols. In the Russian Federation, the commercial production of bacteriophage medicinal products is conducted in accordance with the quality standards specified in the State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation. CONCLUSIONS . There are fundamental differences in the approaches to phage therapy and its regulation around the world and in the Russian Federation. It is reasonable to supplement the current national guidelines for the safety and efficacy evaluation of bacteriophage preparations, in particular, to specify the requirements for conducting preclinical studies.

Biological Products Prevention Diagnosis TreatmentVol. 24(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.