Emergency physicians perspectives of state continuing medical education requirements for medical licensure
Although well-intended, state CME requirements may lack relevancy and can, at times, place an undue burden on emergency physicians. Tailoring CME requirements to increase relevance to their patient populations and reduce barriers to completing CME could enhance knowledge translation and improve patient outcomes.
Authors
- M. Barton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9181-2235)
- Yachana Bhakta
- Lisa Moreno‐Walton
- Jeffrey Druck (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7304-0850)
- Michael C. Bond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-6758)
- Marianne Gausche‐Hill (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6367-8455)
- Jonathan Spencer Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0333-5212)
- Sandra M. Schneider (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9782-8625)
- Colleen E. Livingston
Institutions
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- American Board of Emergency Medicine (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- UCLA Medical Center (US)
- Jackson Memorial Hospital (US)
- University of Utah Hospital (US)
- St. Francis Hospital (US)
- Mississippi Division of Medicaid (US)
- Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US)
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13314
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Innovations in Medical Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.54