Pyrite in-situ S–Fe isotope constraints on the ore-forming sources and mineralization processes of gold and polymetallic deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula, North China Craton

• Pyrite in-situ S isotopes indicate distinct sources for Au and Pb–Zn–Ag deposits. • Pyrite in-situ Fe isotopes trace the distinct mineralization processes of Au and associated Pb–Zn–Ag. • Combined Fe–S isotope signatures provide direct evidence for the contribution of various sources and metallogenic processes for distinct gold and polymetallic deposits. Plenty of gold and polymetallic deposits are widespread in the eastern part of the North China Craton. They are associated with mafic to felsic dikes and hosted by Precambrian basement or Mesozoic granitoids. However, the sources of gold and other metals in the ore-forming fluids remain controversial. Here we present in-situ S and Fe isotopes and trace element contents of pyrites from various gold and Pb–Zn–(Ag) deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula, China. Pyrites from quartz vein-type gold deposit hosted by Mesozoic granites in the Wulong deposit have relatively homogeneous magmatic-like S isotopes (δ 34 S values of 0.9 ‰ to 2.5 ‰) and Co/Ni ratios, indicating derivation of sulfur and, by inference, of ore fluids/materials most likely from Mesozoic magmas. In contrast, pyrites from gold and Pb–Zn–(Ag) deposits in the Qingchengzi orefield hosted by Precambrian basement have high and variable δ 34 S values (9.7 ‰ to 12.7 ‰ for the Wandigou altered rock-type gold deposit and 4.7 ‰ to 8.5 ‰ for the Xiquegou Pb–Zn deposit and the Zhenzigou Pb–Zn–Ag deposit), identical to those of host rocks, indicating the important contributions of gold and other metals from wall rocks to the ore deposits. Pyrites from the various deposits have variable δ 56 Fe values of 0.08 ‰ to 0.63 ‰ for the Pb–Zn–Ag deposit, –0.58 ‰ to 1.23 ‰ for the altered rock-type gold deposit, and –0.68 ‰ to 0.77 ‰ for the quartz vein-type gold deposit, indicating distinct mineralization processes. Rapid precipitation of pyrites (with negative δ 56 Fe values) in the alteration rock and subsequent deposition of pyrites (with positive δ 56 Fe values) from the residual fluids in an Fe-open hydrothermal system during intensive ore-forming fluid-wall rock interaction account for the Pb–Zn–Ag mineralization, while weak fluid-rock interaction and pyrites precipitation from a Fe-closed hydrothermal system contribute to gold mineralization. Our observations provide a robust S–Fe isotope evidence for the contribution of various sources and metallogenic processes for distinct gold and polymetallic deposits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106274
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pyrite in-situ S–Fe isotope constraints on the ore-forming sources and mineralization processes of gold and polymetallic deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula, North China Craton

Lei Xu, Lie‐Wen Xie, Qingdong Zeng, Jin‐Hui Yang et al.
1 citations
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
0.53
article

Pyrite in-situ S–Fe isotope constraints on the ore-forming sources and mineralization processes of gold and polymetallic deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula, North China Craton

Lei Xu, Lie‐Wen Xie, Qingdong Zeng, Jin‐Hui Yang, Hao Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Pyrite in-situ S isotopes indicate distinct sources for Au and Pb–Zn–Ag deposits. • Pyrite in-situ Fe isotopes trace the distinct mineralization processes of Au and associated Pb–Zn–Ag. • Combined Fe–S isotope signatures provide direct evidence for the contribution of various sources and metallogenic processes for distinct gold and polymetallic deposits. Plenty of gold and polymetallic deposits are widespread in the eastern part of the North China Craton. They are associated with mafic to felsic dikes and hosted by Precambrian basement or Mesozoic granitoids. However, the sources of gold and other metals in the ore-forming fluids remain controversial. Here we present in-situ S and Fe isotopes and trace element contents of pyrites from various gold and Pb–Zn–(Ag) deposits in the Liaodong Peninsula, China. Pyrites from quartz vein-type gold deposit hosted by Mesozoic granites in the Wulong deposit have relatively homogeneous magmatic-like S isotopes (δ 34 S values of 0.9 ‰ to 2.5 ‰) and Co/Ni ratios, indicating derivation of sulfur and, by inference, of ore fluids/materials most likely from Mesozoic magmas. In contrast, pyrites from gold and Pb–Zn–(Ag) deposits in the Qingchengzi orefield hosted by Precambrian basement have high and variable δ 34 S values (9.7 ‰ to 12.7 ‰ for the Wandigou altered rock-type gold deposit and 4.7 ‰ to 8.5 ‰ for the Xiquegou Pb–Zn deposit and the Zhenzigou Pb–Zn–Ag deposit), identical to those of host rocks, indicating the important contributions of gold and other metals from wall rocks to the ore deposits. Pyrites from the various deposits have variable δ 56 Fe values of 0.08 ‰ to 0.63 ‰ for the Pb–Zn–Ag deposit, –0.58 ‰ to 1.23 ‰ for the altered rock-type gold deposit, and –0.68 ‰ to 0.77 ‰ for the quartz vein-type gold deposit, indicating distinct mineralization processes. Rapid precipitation of pyrites (with negative δ 56 Fe values) in the alteration rock and subsequent deposition of pyrites (with positive δ 56 Fe values) from the residual fluids in an Fe-open hydrothermal system during intensive ore-forming fluid-wall rock interaction account for the Pb–Zn–Ag mineralization, while weak fluid-rock interaction and pyrites precipitation from a Fe-closed hydrothermal system contribute to gold mineralization. Our observations provide a robust S–Fe isotope evidence for the contribution of various sources and metallogenic processes for distinct gold and polymetallic deposits.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 173
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.