Queer(ing) the Bias Monster and Subjectivities: Shifting From Confessions to Reflexivity

Bias is a long-established concern in qualitative research, and researchers often work to erase, or at least manage, bias through subjectivity statements that work as confessionals, rather than approaching bias and subjectivity as inevitable, humanizing, and valuable research concepts. This paper draws on imaginative narratives and Barad’s engagements with queer theory to emphasize the importance of disrupting these notions and understanding bias and subjectivity as dynamic and mutable concepts that might contribute to deeper reflexivity and new research possibilities. The overarching argument is to tie bias, subjectivity, and reflexivity together not as oppositional or even complementary concepts but as a queer self-birthing of multiple, mutable selves full of possibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/pbda-z115
Primary Topic
African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Queer(ing) the Bias Monster and Subjectivities: Shifting From Confessions to Reflexivity

Stephanie Anne Shelton
Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
article

Queer(ing) the Bias Monster and Subjectivities: Shifting From Confessions to Reflexivity

Stephanie Anne Shelton
article en

Abstract

Bias is a long-established concern in qualitative research, and researchers often work to erase, or at least manage, bias through subjectivity statements that work as confessionals, rather than approaching bias and subjectivity as inevitable, humanizing, and valuable research concepts. This paper draws on imaginative narratives and Barad’s engagements with queer theory to emphasize the importance of disrupting these notions and understanding bias and subjectivity as dynamic and mutable concepts that might contribute to deeper reflexivity and new research possibilities. The overarching argument is to tie bias, subjectivity, and reflexivity together not as oppositional or even complementary concepts but as a queer self-birthing of multiple, mutable selves full of possibility.

Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Queer(ing) the Bias Monster and Subjectivities: Shifting From Confessions to Reflexivity — Stephanie Anne Shelton · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS