The US Census, the MENA Campaign, and Classification Struggles: Neoliberal Distribution of Pride, Fear, and Deception

In this paper, I explore the history of the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) campaign, which aims to extract Southwest Asian and North Africa populations from the white legal category on the US Census. I use Bourdieu’s classification struggles and theory of field to make sense of different approaches to this campaign. The data presented in the paper are gathered from 65 qualitative interviews with activists and citizens with Southwest Asian and North African backgrounds. The data manifest that although all participants unanimously reject the relevance of their current legal white racial category, they have divergent reasons for their support, or lack thereof, for the campaign, all of which are different from the advocacy organizations’ framing of it. I draw on these variant perspectives to investigate the classification struggles between different actors at different levels and examine how these actors meet in the field and pursue their goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2024-10-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205241286509
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The US Census, the MENA Campaign, and Classification Struggles: Neoliberal Distribution of Pride, Fear, and Deception

Hadi Khoshneviss
1 citations
Critical Sociology
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
1.13
article

The US Census, the MENA Campaign, and Classification Struggles: Neoliberal Distribution of Pride, Fear, and Deception

Hadi Khoshneviss
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper, I explore the history of the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) campaign, which aims to extract Southwest Asian and North Africa populations from the white legal category on the US Census. I use Bourdieu’s classification struggles and theory of field to make sense of different approaches to this campaign. The data presented in the paper are gathered from 65 qualitative interviews with activists and citizens with Southwest Asian and North African backgrounds. The data manifest that although all participants unanimously reject the relevance of their current legal white racial category, they have divergent reasons for their support, or lack thereof, for the campaign, all of which are different from the advocacy organizations’ framing of it. I draw on these variant perspectives to investigate the classification struggles between different actors at different levels and examine how these actors meet in the field and pursue their goals.

Critical SociologyVol. 51(6)
Rhodes College (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.